Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Logic
|
Buy Now
Berkeley - Ideas, Immateralism, and Objective Presence (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R2,749
Discovery Miles 27 490
|
|
Berkeley - Ideas, Immateralism, and Objective Presence (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 19 working days
|
Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence offers a
novel interpretation of the arc of George Berkeley's philosophical
thought, from his theory of vision through his immaterialism and
finally to his proof of God's existence. Keota Fields unifies these
themes to focus on Berkeley's use of the Cartesian doctrine of
objective presence, which demands causal explanations of the
content of ideas. This is particularly so with respect to
Berkeley's arguments for immaterialism. One of those arguments is
typically read as a straightforward transitivity argument. After
identifying material bodies with sensible objects, and the latter
with ideas of sense, Berkeley concludes that putative material
bodies are actually identical to collections of ideas of sense.
George Pappas has recently defended an alternative reading that
grounds Berkeley's immaterialism in his rejection of what Pappas
calls category-transcendent abstract ideas: abstract ideas of
beings, entia, or existence. Fields uses Pappas's interpretation as
a framework for understanding Berkeley's immaterialism in terms of
transcendental arguments. Early moderns routinely used the doctrine
of objective presence to justify transcendental arguments for the
existence of material substance. The claim was that physical
qualities are necessary for any causal explanation of the content
of sensory ideas; since those qualities are represented to
perceivers as ontologically dependent, material substance is the
necessary condition for the existence of physical qualities and a
fortiori any causal explanation of the content of sensory ideas. On
the reading defended here, Berkeley rejects Locke's transcendental
argument for the existence of material substratum on the grounds
that it turns decisively on the aforementioned
category-transcendent abstract ideas, which Berkeley rejects as
logically inconsistent. In its place, Berkeley offers his own
transcendental argument designed to show that only minds and ideas
exist. He uses that argument as a
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.