What role did manhood play in early American Politics? In A
Republic of Men, Mark E. Kann argues that the American founders
aspired to create a "republic of men" but feared that "disorderly
men" threatened its birth, health, and longevity. Kann demonstrates
how hegemonic norms of manhood-exemplified by "the Family Man," for
instance--were deployed as a means of stigmatizing unworthy men,
rewarding responsible men with citizenship, and empowering
exceptional men with positions of leadership and authority, while
excluding women from public life.
Kann suggests that the founders committed themselves in theory
to the democratic proposition that all men were created free and
equal and could not be governed without their own consent, but that
they in no way believed that "all men" could be trusted with equal
liberty, equal citizenship, or equal authority. The founders
developed a "grammar of manhood" to address some difficult
questions about public order. Were America's disorderly men
qualified for citizenship? Were they likely to recognize manly
leaders, consent to their authority, and defer to their wisdom? A
Republic of Men compellingly analyzes the ways in which the
founders used a rhetoric of manhood to stabilize American
politics.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!