How does the American public formulate its opinions about U.S.
foreign policy and military engagement abroad? "War Stories" argues
that the media systematically distort the information the public
vitally needs to determine whether to support such initiatives, for
reasons having more to do with journalists' professional interests
than the merits of the policies, and that this has significant
consequences for national security. Matthew Baum and Tim Groeling
develop a "strategic bias" theory that explains the foreign-policy
communication process as a three-way interaction among the press,
political elites, and the public, each of which has distinct
interests, biases, and incentives.
Do media representations affect public support for the president
and faithfully reflect events in times of diplomatic crisis and
war? How do new media--especially Internet news and more partisan
outlets--shape public opinion, and how will they alter future
conflicts? In answering such questions, Baum and Groeling take an
in-depth look at media coverage, elite rhetoric, and public opinion
during the Iraq war and other U.S. conflicts abroad. They trace how
traditional and new media select stories, how elites frame and
sometimes even distort events, and how these dynamics shape public
opinion over the course of a conflict.
Most of us learn virtually everything we know about foreign
policy from media reporting of elite opinions. In "War Stories,"
Baum and Groeling reveal precisely what this means for the future
of American foreign policy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!