Books > Law > Jurisprudence & general issues > Legal history
|
Buy Now
Agreeing to Disagree - How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R575
Discovery Miles 5 750
|
|
Agreeing to Disagree - How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (Hardcover)
Series: Inalienable Rights
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R575
Discovery Miles 5 750
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
In one of the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause of
the First Amendment, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell
provide an insightful overview of the legal history and meaning of
the clause, as well as its value for promoting equal religious
freedom and diversity in contemporary America. The Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion", may be the most
contentious and misunderstood provision of the entire U.S.
Constitution. It lies at the heart of America's culture wars. But
what, exactly, is an "establishment of religion"? And what is a law
"respecting" it? Many commentators reduce the clause to "the
separation of church and state." This implies that church and state
are at odds, that the public sphere must be secular, and that the
Establishment Clause is in tension with the Free Exercise of
Religion Clause. All of these implications misconstrue the
Establishment Clause's original purpose and enduring value for a
religiously pluralistic society. The clause facilitates religious
diversity and guarantees equality of religious freedom by
prohibiting the government from coercing or inducing citizens to
change their religious beliefs and practices. In Agreeing to
Disagree, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell detail the
theological, political, and philosophical underpinnings of the
Establishment Clause, state disestablishment, and the
disestablishment norms applied to the states by the Fourteenth
Amendment. Americans in the early Republic were intimately
acquainted with the laws used in England, the colonies, and early
states to enforce religious uniformity. The Establishment Clause
was understood to prohibit the government from incentivizing such
uniformity. Chapman and McConnell show how the U.S. Supreme Court
has largely implemented these purposes in cases addressing prayer
in school, state funding of religious schools, religious symbols on
public property, and limits on religious accommodations. In one of
the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause, Chapman and
McConnell argue that the clause is best understood as a
constitutional commitment for Americans to agree to disagree about
matters of faith.
General
Imprint: |
Oxford UniversityPress
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Series: |
Inalienable Rights |
Release date: |
July 2023 |
Authors: |
Nathan S Chapman
(McDonald Distinguished Fellow of Law and Religion)
• Michael W McConnell
(Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center)
|
Dimensions: |
210 x 140mm (L x W) |
Format: |
Hardcover - Cloth over boards
|
Pages: |
208 |
ISBN-13: |
978-0-19-530466-4 |
Categories: |
Books >
Law >
Jurisprudence & general issues >
Legal history
|
LSN: |
0-19-530466-7 |
Barcode: |
9780195304664 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.