0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Law > Jurisprudence & general issues > Legal history

Buy Now

Agreeing to Disagree - How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (Hardcover) Loot Price: R611
Discovery Miles 6 110
You Save: R39 (6%)
Agreeing to Disagree - How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (Hardcover): Nathan...

Agreeing to Disagree - How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (Hardcover)

Nathan S Chapman, Michael W McConnell

Series: Inalienable Rights

 (sign in to rate)
List price R650 Loot Price R611 Discovery Miles 6 110 | Repayment Terms: R57 pm x 12* You Save R39 (6%)

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days

In one of the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell provide an insightful overview of the legal history and meaning of the clause, as well as its value for promoting equal religious freedom and diversity in contemporary America. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion", may be the most contentious and misunderstood provision of the entire U.S. Constitution. It lies at the heart of America's culture wars. But what, exactly, is an "establishment of religion"? And what is a law "respecting" it? Many commentators reduce the clause to "the separation of church and state." This implies that church and state are at odds, that the public sphere must be secular, and that the Establishment Clause is in tension with the Free Exercise of Religion Clause. All of these implications misconstrue the Establishment Clause's original purpose and enduring value for a religiously pluralistic society. The clause facilitates religious diversity and guarantees equality of religious freedom by prohibiting the government from coercing or inducing citizens to change their religious beliefs and practices. In Agreeing to Disagree, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell detail the theological, political, and philosophical underpinnings of the Establishment Clause, state disestablishment, and the disestablishment norms applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. Americans in the early Republic were intimately acquainted with the laws used in England, the colonies, and early states to enforce religious uniformity. The Establishment Clause was understood to prohibit the government from incentivizing such uniformity. Chapman and McConnell show how the U.S. Supreme Court has largely implemented these purposes in cases addressing prayer in school, state funding of religious schools, religious symbols on public property, and limits on religious accommodations. In one of the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause, Chapman and McConnell argue that the clause is best understood as a constitutional commitment for Americans to agree to disagree about matters of faith.

General

Imprint: Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin: United States
Series: Inalienable Rights
Release date: July 2023
Authors: Nathan S Chapman (McDonald Distinguished Fellow of Law and Religion) • Michael W McConnell (Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center)
Dimensions: 210 x 140mm (L x W)
Format: Hardcover - Cloth over boards
Pages: 208
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-530466-4
Categories: Books > Law > Jurisprudence & general issues > Legal history
LSN: 0-19-530466-7
Barcode: 9780195304664

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners