Books > Professional & Technical > Civil engineering, surveying & building > Building construction & materials > Fire protection & safety
|
Buy Now
Performance of New and Aged Residential Fire Smoke Detectors (Paperback)
Loot Price: R444
Discovery Miles 4 440
|
|
Performance of New and Aged Residential Fire Smoke Detectors (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R444
Discovery Miles 4 440
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
As part of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) technical
staff program to determine the effects of emissions from imported
drywall on residential electrical, gas distribution, and fire
safety components, the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) has generated data to aid assessment of whether
there has been a loss of functionality of fire smoke detectors
exposed to those emissions. NIST tested four sets of smoke
detectors in the Fire Emulator/Detector Evaluator (FEDE) and the UL
217 test apparatus. Set 1 (ionization only) detectors were provided
by CPSC staff and described as having been installed in homes with
imported drywall; Set 2 (ionization only) detectors (same models as
Set 1 but different batches) were described as coming from
contemporaneous homes without the presence of imported drywall; Set
3 smoke detectors were purchased new by NIST and tested as
received; and Set 4 comprised detectors from Set 3 that had been
subjected to an accelerated aging protocol to simulate 10-year
exposure to the effluent from imported drywall. Detectors from Set
1 and Set 2 activated within UL 217 sensitivity test parameters.
Tests using the FEDE found differences in sensitivity between Sets
1 and 2 and between the ionization detectors in Sets 3 and 4 that
were numerically small compared to the allowable performance range.
An even smaller improvement in sensitivity was found for
photoelectric smoke detectors between Sets 3 and 4. Two of the Set
1 smoke detectors sensed the presence of smoke, but would not send
the signal to activate interconnected alarms. Two other Set 1 smoke
detectors failed to operate under AC power, but operated properly
under the required 9V battery back-up. It could not be determined
whether the observations of Set 1 detector performance could be
attributed to exposure to the emissions from imported drywall or to
other factors.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.