Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law > Citizenship & nationality law
|
Buy Now
Determination of the legality in international law of direct intervention in Iraq on the authority of Security Council Resolution 1441 (Paperback)
Loot Price: R769
Discovery Miles 7 690
|
|
Determination of the legality in international law of direct intervention in Iraq on the authority of Security Council Resolution 1441 (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Essay from the year 2003 in the subject Law - European and
International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: 1 (A),
University of Kent (Kent Law School), 12 entries in the
bibliography, language: English, comment: UN Security Council
Resolution 1441 and international law in the justification of the
Iraq war., abstract: International law provides for a general
prohibition of the use or the threat of use of force to settle
international disputes. Only very few exceptions from this rule
exist and are clearly defined in the UN Charter. The question must
thus be, if resolution 1441 constitutes such an exception of the
rule and thus authorises the use of force against Iraq. A close
examination of the resolution shall therefore be the starting point
of this discussion. However, it must be said that the wording of
any Security Council resolution is subject to individual
interpretation. A second step must thus be to apply rules for the
interpretation of Security Council resolutions if such rules exist
at all. It appears that only very little authoritative guidelines
to the interpretation of Security Council resolutions exist and
that thus the only reliable source of guidance is previous
interpretations. Those promoting direct intervention in Iraq
without a further resolution refer to NATO bombings of Kosovo.
Similarly to the present situation in Iraq, the Security Council
did not explicitly authorise the use of force in that case either.
Later, the international community claimed that because no
agreement could be reached in the Security Council, military action
without Security Council authorisation was necessary in order to
prevent genocide. The argument being of course, that a legitimate
aim could justify the use of illegal means. The question whether
direct intervention in Iraq can be legitimate on the basis of
resolution 1441 seems to be a much broader question, which embraces
moral and ethical considerations, too. Unfortunately, a discussion
of the moral and et
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.