The KC-135 airframe suffers from an aft Center of Gravity (CG).
Boeing accounts for this aft CG by requiring that ballast fuel be
carried in the forward body tank to maintain a CG forward of the
aft limit. Boeing has analyzed the issue and states that 3,500 lbs
of fuel is to be left in the forward body tank strictly for
ballast. Using fuel in the forward body tank for ballast has two
significant drawbacks; the forward body tank has a very short
moment-arm necessitating more weight than that of ballast on a
longer moment-arm, and ballast fuel displaces fuel that could be
used for mission purposes by using the tank to hold ballast weight.
Reducing aircraft gross weight is a cost issue, because excess
weight incurs a carriage cost. The carriage cost for weight on the
KC-135 is 4.97% of the weight in pounds of fuel burned per hour.
This thesis focuses on the cost recoupment horizon for reballasting
the KC-135 fleet and whether the cost will justify the fuel
efficiency and increased mission capability. Specifically, this
research examines replacement of fuel ballast with lead ballast on
a longer moment arm and/or weight with a mission purpose, in the
form of cockpit armor, to minimize ballast weight requirements.
This will reduce aircraft gross weight and generate increased fuel
efficiency.
General
Imprint: |
Biblioscholar
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
November 2012 |
First published: |
November 2012 |
Authors: |
Philip G. Morrison
|
Dimensions: |
246 x 189 x 5mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Paperback - Trade
|
Pages: |
90 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-288-31970-1 |
Categories: |
Books >
Social sciences >
Education >
General
|
LSN: |
1-288-31970-3 |
Barcode: |
9781288319701 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!