An increasing number of constitutional theorists, within both
the legal academy and university departments of government, are
focusing on the conceptual and political problems attached to the
notion of constitutional amendment. Amendments are, among other
things, recognitions of the imperfection of existing schemes of
government. The relative ease or difficulty of amendment has
significant implications for the ways that governments respond to
problems that call either for new structures of governance or new
powers for already established structures. This book brings
together essays by leading legal authorities and political
scientists on a range of questions from whether the U.S.
Constitution is subject to amendment by procedures other than those
authorized by Article V to how significant change is conceptualized
within classical rabbinic Judaism. Though the essays are concerned
for the most part with the American experience, other
constitutional traditions are considered as well.
The contributors include Bruce Ackerman, Akhil Reed Amar, Mark
E. Brandon, David R. Dow, Stephen M. Griffin, Stephen Holmes and
Cass R. Sunstein, Sanford Levinson, Donald Lutz, Walter Murphy,
Frederick Schauer, John R. Vile, and Noam J. Zohar.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!