Relying on extensive candid interviews from members of Congress
and staff on defense authorization committees and senior Army
general officers, Scroggs provides a strong insider analysis with
recommendations. He examines the impact of culture on the varying
abilities of public agencies, specifically the Army, to pursue its
organizational interests through lobbying or liaising Congress.
Scroggs argues that despite structural similarities in how the four
military services approach Congress, differences in service culture
affect their relative success in achieving their goals on the
Hill.
Scroggs draws four major conclusions. First, despite a law
prohibiting lobbying of Congress by public agencies, Congress views
lobbying or liaising by public entities, especially the military
services, not only as a legitimate activity, but essential to
Members carrying out their constitutional responsibilities. Second,
relative to the other services, the Army is viewed by Congress as
the least effective in its lobbying. Third, the Army's patterned
approach with Congress is largely a function of its unrecognized
and uncompensated culture in the unique terrain of the nation's
capital. Fourth, because of the need for balanced service
representation to Congress, relatively less effective Army efforts
have troubling implications for national security and Army
self-interest.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!