Both Anglo-American and Continental thinkers have long denied
that there can be a coherent moral defense of the poststructuralist
politics of Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, and Jean-Francois
Lyotard. For many Anglo-American thinkers, as well as for Critical
Theorists such as Habermas, poststructuralism is not coherent
enough to defend morally. Alternatively, for Foucault, Deleuze,
Lyotard, and their followers, the practice of moral theorizing is
passe at best and more likely insidious.
Todd May argues both that a moral defense of poststructuralism
is necessary and that it is possible. First, he develops a
metaethical view of moral theorizing that treats it as a social
practice rather than a transcendentally derived guarantee for right
action. He then articulates and defends antirepresentationalism, a
principle central to poststructuralism. Finally, May offers a
version of consequentialism that is consonant both with the
principle of antirepresentationalism and with other
poststructuralist commitments. In conclusion, he distinguishes
morality from an aesthetics of living and shows the role the latter
plays for those who embrace antirepresentationalism.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!