|
Showing 1 - 15 of
15 matches in All Departments
What do Christians mean when they call Jesus "son of God"? In this
study of the phrase "son of God" as applied to Jesus of Nazareth,
Christopher Bryan examines the testimony of various New Testament
witnesses who used this expression to speak of him, and asks where
they got it, what they meant by it, and how it might have been
understood. In Bryan's view, any attempt to address these questions
stands self-condemned if it does not point to both the words and
works of Jesus himself in the memory of early Christians, and the
Torah of Israel as then understood, centering on Israel's
Scriptures. Of course Paul and his fellow believers did not
proclaim Jesus in a vacuum. They proclaimed Jesus in the Roman
Empire during the decades following the death of Augustus. With
regard to the meaning of the phrase "son of God," what becomes
clear, Bryan argues, is that whereas "Lord" (another expression
frequently used in the New Testament for Jesus of Nazareth)
reflects believers' sense of Jesus' relationship to them, "son of
God" reflects their sense of his relationship to God. It is a title
that reflects their consciousness of Jesus' holiness-that is, his
"set-apartness," his consecration, and even his divinity. Readers
of Son of God will gain a well-rounded understanding of classic and
recent research in Christology and the New Testament, as well as an
in-depth, historically situated view of the evidence that paints a
clearer picture of what New Testament witnesses meant when they
called Jesus "son of God."
His reflections on some of the ways we might answer these questions
in the church today became the twelve short chapters of this book.
Here scripture scholar and Anglican priest Christopher Bryan looks
at the nature of the Bible s authority and inspiration and how the
Bible can inform our decision-making today. He explores common
questions about scripture, such as: What do we mean when we say
that the scriptures are revelatory, that they are inspired, that
they are the Word of God? How do we define the Bible s authority
for the past and the future? What does a church that takes the
Bible s authority seriously actually look like? How does it read,
study, and pray with the Bible? And God Spoke offers essential
guidelines for everyone who wonders about the authority of the
Bible, and who wants to read it with attentiveness and
understanding.
Why read poetry? Why not? Do you need a reason for everything? If
you do one thing for no reason in your entire life, get this book
and read it. Put a few moments of poetry in your life. There might
be something for anyone in this book. Enjoy the moment for no
reason.
|
better (Paperback)
Christopher Bryan Pearson
|
R165
Discovery Miles 1 650
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
When an intruder dies mysteriously in Exeter Cathedral, Detective
Inspector Cecilia Cavaliere's investigation becomes anything but
routine. Thwarted by her superiors, she finds an unlikely source of
help in a family friend: but can a law enforcer believe a priest's
stories about an evil she cannot see? Meanwhile, half a world away,
a quiet astronomer makes a discovery of his own--his telescope
reveals nothing less than the impending destruction of the planet.
Christopher Bryan's sharp thriller takes the reader deep into a
supernatural world where something dark and sinister has been
awakened.
The disengagement of recent academic biblical study from church and
synagogue has been widely noted. Even within the discipline, there
are those who suggest it has lost its way. As the discipline now
stands, is it mainly concerned with studying and listening to the
texts, or with dissecting them in order to examine hypothetical
sources or situations or texts that might lie behind them.
Christopher Bryan seeks to address scholars and students who do not
wish to avoid the challenges of the Enlightenment, but do wish to
relate their work to the faith and mission of the people of God. Is
such a combination still possible? And if so, how is the task of
biblical interpretation to be understood? Bryan traces the history
of modern approaches to the Bible, particularly "historical
criticism," noting its successes and failures-and notably among its
failures, that it has been no more able to protect its
practitioners from (in Jowett's phrase) "bringing to the text what
they found there" than were the openly faith-based approaches of
earlier generations. Basing his work on a wide knowledge of
literature and literary critical theory, and drawing on the
insights of the greatest literary critics of the last hundred
years, notably Erich Auerbach and George Steiner, Bryan asks, what
should be the task of the biblical scholar in the 21st century?
Setting the question within this wider context enables Bryan to
indicate a series of criteria with which biblical interpreters may
do their work, and in the light of which there is no reason why
that work cannot relate faithfully to the Church. This does not
mean that sound biblical interpretation can ignore the specificity
of scientific or historical questions, or dragoon its results into
conformity with a set of ecclesial propositions. It does mean that
in asking those questions, interpreters of the biblical text will
not ignore its setting-in-life in the community of faith; and they
will concede that although textual interpretation has scientific
elements, it is finally an exercise in imagination: an art, and not
a science.
A Preface to Mark is a literary study which, from the standpoint of
the newer critical methodologies, explores two questions. First,
Bryan attempts to determine what kind of text Mark would have been
seen to be, both by its author and by others who encountered it
near the time of its writing. He examines whether Mark should be
seen as an example of any particular literary type, and if so
which. He concludes that a comparison of Mark with other texts of
the period leads inevitably to the conclusion that Mark's
contemporaries would broadly have characterized his work as a
"life." Second, Bryan looks at the evidence that exists to indicate
whether Mark, like so much else of its period, was written to be
read aloud. He points out ways in which Mark's narrative would have
worked particularly well as rhetoric. The first examination of Mark
as a whole in the light of contemporary studies of orality and oral
transmission, A Preface to Mark not only shows us Mark in its
original setting, but also suggests ways in which our own encounter
with Marks text may be significantly enriched. Its accessible style
will serve as a good introduction to the Gospel for students as
well as the general reader.
"A good introduction to Mark for both students and general
readers....As interesting as it is informative." -- Choice
"The book is informative and refreshing due to its interaction
with a variety of Graeco-Roman sources." -- Journal for the Study
of the New Testament
..".a readable, well-argued discussion....Byran has written a
useful book hat should be given due consideration." -- Biblical
Studies
"A well-reasoned discussion..." -- Church Times
Bryan approaches St. Paul's letter to the Romans with a number of aims in view. First, he wants to show which literary type or genre would have been seen by Paul's contemporaries as being exemplified in the letter. He also determines what we can surmise of Paul's attitude and approach to the Jewish bible. The study involves discussion of and comparison with other literature from Paul's time, place and milieu -- including other writings attributed to Paul.
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R389
R360
Discovery Miles 3 600
Higher Truth
Chris Cornell
CD
(1)
R158
Discovery Miles 1 580
|