|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
This edited collection gathers together the principal findings of
the three-year RELIGARE project, which dealt with the question of
religious and philosophical diversity in European law.
Specifically, it covers four spheres of public policy and
legislation where the pressure to accommodate religious diversity
has been most strongly felt in Europe: employment, family life, use
of public space and state support mechanisms. Embracing a
forward-looking approach, the final RELIGARE report provides
recommendations to governance units at the local, national and
European levels regarding issues of religious pluralism and
secularism. This volume adds context and critique to those
recommendations and more generally opens an intellectual discussion
on the topic of religion in the European Union. The book consists
of two main parts: the first includes the principal findings of the
RELIGARE research project, while the second is a compilation of 28
short contributions from influential scholars, legal practitioners,
policy makers and activists who respond to the report and offer
their views on the sensitive issue of religious diversity and the
law in Europe.
The increasing global competition of knowledge economies has begun
a new era of labour migration, as economies chase 'the best and the
brightest': the movement of highly skilled workers. This book
examines the experiences of highly educated migrants subjected to
two distinct and incompatible public discourses: one that
identifies them in terms of nationality and presupposed religion,
and another that focuses on their education and employment status,
which suggests that they deserve the best treatment from societies
engaged in the global 'race for talent'. Presenting new empirical
research collected in Amsterdam, Barcelona and London amongst
highly educated migrants from Turkey, the author draws on their
narratives to address the question of whether such migrants should
be apprehended any differently from their predecessors who moved to
Europe as 'guestworkers' in the twentieth century. With attention
to the reasons for which highly skilled workers choose to migrate
and then stay (or not) in their 'host' countries, their connection
to their multiple homes and the ways in which they meet the
challenges of integration - in part by way of their position in
relation to other migrants - and their acquisition of citizenship
in the 'host' country, The Migration of Highly Educated Turkish
Citizens to Europe offers insights on an under-researched trend in
the field of migration. The author develops three nexuses - the
mobility/migration nexus, the mobility/citizenship nexus, and the
mobility/dwelling nexus - to account for the embedded sense of
mobility that underlies these 'new' migrants and offers a holistic
picture about their trajectory from 'arrival to settlement' and all
that lies in-between. As such, it will appeal to scholars in the
fields of sociology and political science with interests in
migration and mobility, ethnicity and integration.
The increasing global competition of knowledge economies has begun
a new era of labour migration, as economies chase 'the best and the
brightest': the movement of highly skilled workers. This book
examines the experiences of highly educated migrants subjected to
two distinct and incompatible public discourses: one that
identifies them in terms of nationality and presupposed religion,
and another that focuses on their education and employment status,
which suggests that they deserve the best treatment from societies
engaged in the global 'race for talent'. Presenting new empirical
research collected in Amsterdam, Barcelona and London amongst
highly educated migrants from Turkey, the author draws on their
narratives to address the question of whether such migrants should
be apprehended any differently from their predecessors who moved to
Europe as 'guestworkers' in the twentieth century. With attention
to the reasons for which highly skilled workers choose to migrate
and then stay (or not) in their 'host' countries, their connection
to their multiple homes and the ways in which they meet the
challenges of integration - in part by way of their position in
relation to other migrants - and their acquisition of citizenship
in the 'host' country, The Migration of Highly Educated Turkish
Citizens to Europe offers insights on an under-researched trend in
the field of migration. The author develops three nexuses - the
mobility/migration nexus, the mobility/citizenship nexus, and the
mobility/dwelling nexus - to account for the embedded sense of
mobility that underlies these 'new' migrants and offers a holistic
picture about their trajectory from 'arrival to settlement' and all
that lies in-between. As such, it will appeal to scholars in the
fields of sociology and political science with interests in
migration and mobility, ethnicity and integration.
This edited collection gathers together the principal findings of
the three-year RELIGARE project, which dealt with the question of
religious and philosophical diversity in European law.
Specifically, it covers four spheres of public policy and
legislation where the pressure to accommodate religious diversity
has been most strongly felt in Europe: employment, family life, use
of public space and state support mechanisms. Embracing a
forward-looking approach, the final RELIGARE report provides
recommendations to governance units at the local, national and
European levels regarding issues of religious pluralism and
secularism. This volume adds context and critique to those
recommendations and more generally opens an intellectual discussion
on the topic of religion in the European Union. The book consists
of two main parts: the first includes the principal findings of the
RELIGARE research project, while the second is a compilation of 28
short contributions from influential scholars, legal practitioners,
policy makers and activists who respond to the report and offer
their views on the sensitive issue of religious diversity and the
law in Europe.
This book offers an in-depth account of the failure of popular
constitution making in Turkey from 2011 to 2013, which was an
anomaly in the otherwise authoritarian history of Turkish
constitutional politics. The authors demonstrate that, even in
unfavorable conditions, constitution making that brings together
different stakeholders can potentially lead to significant
improvement of constitutional regimes. Long-standing societal
divides regarding cultural and religious diversity, which were
evident in political parties' negotiations, played a significant
role in the failure of the process in Turkey. Most notably, the
ruling AKP's insistence on establishing a presidential system -
supported by neither other political parties nor the public -
destabilized the process and exacerbated distrust among the
drafters. Unfavorable procedures, particularly an unrealistic
deadline and the unanimity principle, prevented consensus and
allowed the AKP to hijack the process. The process was a missed
opportunity for democratization before Turkey plunged into
full-fledged democratic backsliding.
This book offers an in-depth account of the failure of popular
constitution making in Turkey from 2011 to 2013, which was an
anomaly in the otherwise authoritarian history of Turkish
constitutional politics. The authors demonstrate that, even in
unfavorable conditions, constitution making that brings together
different stakeholders can potentially lead to significant
improvement of constitutional regimes. Long-standing societal
divides regarding cultural and religious diversity, which were
evident in political parties' negotiations, played a significant
role in the failure of the process in Turkey. Most notably, the
ruling AKP's insistence on establishing a presidential system -
supported by neither other political parties nor the public -
destabilized the process and exacerbated distrust among the
drafters. Unfavorable procedures, particularly an unrealistic
deadline and the unanimity principle, prevented consensus and
allowed the AKP to hijack the process. The process was a missed
opportunity for democratization before Turkey plunged into
full-fledged democratic backsliding.
|
|