|
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Financial, taxation, commercial, industrial law > Financial law > Insurance law
Revisiting Carter v Boehm, the collected papers in this book are
intended as a catalyst for rethinking the pre-contractual duties in
insurance law and the related principle of utmost good faith at a
critical time for insurance law. In so doing, it endeavours to
provide insurance law students, academics, practitioners and judges
with new perspectives for a keen understanding of this fundamental
aspect of insurance law, which has become increasingly dynamic
under both common law and civil law legal traditions. It will
explore to what extent and why the doctrines of pre-contractual
duties in insurance law under the two major legal traditions are
converging, as well as the implications of such convergence. It
will be of great interest to students, academics and practitioners
in the field of insurance law.
Spencer Bower: Reliance-Based Estoppel, previously titled Estoppel
by Representation, is the highly regarded and long established
textbook on the doctrines of reliance-based estoppel, by which a
party is prevented from changing his position if he has induced
another to rely on it such that the other will suffer by that
change. Since the fourth edition in 2003 the House of Lords has
decided two proprietary estoppel cases, Cobbe v Yeoman's Row
Property Management Ltd and Thorner v Major, whose combined effect
is identified as helping to define a criterion for a reliance-based
estoppel founded on a representation, namely that the party
estopped actually intends the estoppel raiser to act in reliance on
the representation, or is reasonably understood to intend him so to
act. Other developments in the doctrine of proprietary estoppel
have required a complete revision of the related chapter, Chapter
12, in this edition. Thorner v Major confirms too the submission in
the fourth edition that unequivocality is a requirement for any
reliance-based estoppel founded on a representation. Other views
expressed in the fourth edition are also noted to have been upheld,
such as the recognition that an estoppel may be founded on a
representation of law (Briggs v Gleeds), that a party may preclude
itself from denying a proposition by contract as well as another's
reliance (Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Ltd and Springwell Navigation Corp v JP Morgan Chase Bank)
and that an estoppel by deed binds by agreement or declaration
under seal rather than by reason of reliance (Prime Sight Ltd v
Lavarello). With the adjustment reflected in the change of title,
and distinguishing the foundation of estoppels that bind by deed
and by contract, the editors adopt Spencer Bower's unificatory
project by the identification of the reliance-based estoppels as
aspects of a single principle preventing a change of position that
would be unfair by reason of responsibility for prejudicial
reliance. From this follow the views: that reliance-based estoppels
have common requirements of responsibility, causation and
prejudice; that estoppel by representation of fact is, like the
other reliance-based estoppels, a rule of law; that the result of
estoppel by representation of fact may, accordingly, be mitigated
on equitable grounds to avoid injustice; that the result of an
estoppel by convention depends on whether its subject matter is
factual, promissory or proprietary; that a reliance-based estoppel
(other than a proprietary estoppel, which uniquely generates a
cause of action) may be deployed to complete a cause of action
where, absent the estoppel, a cause of action would not lie, unless
it would unacceptably subvert a rule of law (in particular the
doctrine of consideration); that an estoppel as to a right in or
over property generates a discretionary remedy; and that the
prohibition on the deployment of a promissory estoppel as a sword
should be understood as an application of the defence of
illegality, viz that an estoppel may not unacceptably subvert a
statute or rule of law.
Insurance companies make billions of dollars by minimizing soft
tissue injury claims. They are highly skilled at using strong
tactics to accomplish this goal. Many individuals who suffer from
injuries related to automobile, semi trucks, or motorcycle
accidents often realize this far too late. Now, seasoned personal
injury attorney B.J. Kelley draws from decades of experience to
provide anyone suffering from an accident with an effective plan of
action to manage the claim process. Soft Tissue Injuries and Hard
Ball Tactics: Dealing With Soft Tissue Injuries and Insurance
Companies is a straightforward, step-by-step "how to" manual to
help anyone overcome the daunting hurdles that insurance companies
put forth to minimize personal injury claims. The average person is
typically not equipped to deal with the carriers on their own. In
fact, many of those who incur accident-related injuries simply
believe they are just "a little sore" and expect to improve within
a few days. However, there is often a delay in the onset of soft
tissue pain so that the pain doesn't present until well after a
person has foregone an attorney's counsel and made statements that
indicated that all was well. Regrettably, this all-too-common
course of events may work to your disadvantage when ultimately
filing a soft tissue claim. To avoid pitfalls of this nature,
Kelley clearly maps out every aspect of this all-important
scenario. The book first details the motivations of the insurance
companies. It then lays out the carriers' standard procedures and
discusses why your own company won't necessarily help you after an
accident. The author then itemizes the do's and don'ts you should
consider after you've been in a wreck, from calling the police to
hiring an attorney. He then defines a soft tissue injury, and the
reasons the injury may not be immediately evident after a
collision. The book also discusses medical treatment, the
challenges of soft tissue injury cases, and what to expect from
your attorney during the course of your case. When it comes to soft
tissue injuries, information will give you the crucial power you
need to handle your claim, and get the treatment to which you are
entitled for as long as you may require it. Clear, concise, and
indispensable, Soft Tissue Injuries and Hard Ball Tactics: Dealing
With Soft Tissue Injuries and Insurance Companies can help ensure
that the pain of an accident can be minimized in every way. Read
it-and reap the coverage you have coming.
A guide to purchasing the proper automobile insurance in Maryland.
This guide will tell you what each part of the insurance policy
means, and why you need it.
This brand new book provides an authoritative working guide to
consumer insurance law. It takes the form of a multi-authored
handbook explaining the reforms brought about by the Consumer
Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 and the impact
these reforms will have on consumer insurance law. Contents
includes: Consumer insurance - the current law on pre-contractual
information; Self-regulation and the failure of previous reform
initiatives; The FSA - the impact of rules, guidance and TCF
initiatives; The Financial Ombudsman Service - its role and
approach and the effect of its decisions; The Law Commissions'
reform proposals and the impact of the new Act; Perspectives;
Looking forward - what's next on the reform agenda?; Preparing for
change; Looking forward - what's next on the reform agenda? Also
includes appendices containing the text of the self-regulatory
codes, the relevant FSA rules and the new Act.
There are seemingly endless uncertainties in life. One thing is
almost certain for Medicare beneficiaries; you will face an
unexpected health event. In the Medicare environment there are only
really two ways in which you can eliminate the risks imposed by
original Medicare coverage. In this book I outline how these
options emerged in legislative history, their comparative strengths
over all other plans in the market, and the practical steps you can
take to use those options to your advantage.
The other driver's insurance company has agreed to pay the cost to
repair the collision damage to you new car, but is that all there
is. No, you could be entitled to more. The section dealing with
automobile property damage will disclose some cash you may have
overlooked. You or a resident relative hits an errant shot on the
golf course and instead of its intended destination, the ball
smashes the windshield of another member's car on the parking lot.
You are probably not legally liable for the damage, but you can be
a "good guy" and pay the cost to repair under a special coverage in
your homeowners' policy. Look at all the possibilities in
"Infrequently Reported Homeowners Claims." As a member of a same
sex marriage in a state where such unions are recognized, what are
your rights with respect to the injuries or wrongful death of a
spouse? See chapter "(Damages)" for a discussion of this question.
The drunk driver who caused your injuries may not be your only
source of retribution. Take a look at "Liquor Liability." A kitchen
appliance you have not altered in any way causes a fire that
seriously damages your home and injures you or members of your
family. What are your rights with respect to claims against the
manufacturer or vendor of the product?
|
You may like...
Botany of Gin, The
Chris Thorogood, Simon Hiscock
Hardcover
R532
R438
Discovery Miles 4 380
|