Books > Language & Literature > Language teaching & learning (other than ELT) > Specific skills > Speaking / pronunciation skills > Public speaking / elocution
|
Buy Now
Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R1,330
Discovery Miles 13 300
You Save: R191
(13%)
|
|
Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates (Hardcover)
Series: Studies in Rhetoric / Communication
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
What explains the "triumph of capitalism"? Why do people so often
respond positively to discussions favoring it while shutting down
arguments against it? Overwhelmingly theories regarding
capitalism's resilience have focused on individual choice bolstered
by careful rhetorical argumentation. In this penetrating study,
however, Catherine Chaput shows that something more than choice is
at work in capitalism's ability to thrive in public practice and
imagination--more even than material resources (power) and cultural
imperialism (ideology). That "something," she contends, is market
affect. Affect, says Chaput, signifies a semi-autonomous entity
circulating through individuals and groups. Physiological in nature
but moving across cultural, material, and environmental boundaries,
affect has three functions: it opens or closes individual
receptivity; it pulls or pushes individual identification; and it
raises or lowers individual energies. This novel approach begins by
connecting affect to rhetorical theory and offers a method for
tracking its three modalities in relation to economic markets. Each
of the following chapters compares a major theorist of capitalism
with one of his important critics, beginning with the juxtaposition
of Adam Smith and Karl Marx, who Set the agenda not only for
arguments endorsing and critiquing capitalism but also for the
affective energies associated with these positions. Subsequent
chapters restage this initial debate through pairs of economic
theorists--John Maynard Keynes and Thorstein Veblen, Friedrich
Hayek and Theodor Adorno, and Milton Friedman and John Kenneth
Galbraith--who represent key historical moments. In each case,
Chaput demonstrates, capitalism's critics have fallen short in
their rhetorical effectiveness. Chaput concludes by exploring
possibilities for escaping the straitjacket imposed by these
debates. In particular she points to the biopolitical lectures of
Michel Foucault as offering a framework for more persuasive
anticapitalist critiques by reconstituting people's conscious
understandings as well as their natural instincts.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.