This book examines the conception of the person at work in John
Rawls's writings from "Theory of Justice "to "Justice as Fairness:
A Restatement." The book aims to show that objections to Rawls's
political conception of the person fail and that a Rawlsian
conception of political identity is defensible. The book shows that
the debate between liberals and communitarians is relevant to the
current debate regarding perfectionism and neutrality in politics,
and clarifies the debate between Rawls and communitarians in a way
that will promote fruitful discussion on the issue of political
identity. It does this by providing a clearer account of a
conception of personal identity according to which persons are
socially constituted, including the intuitions and assumptions
underlying the communitarians' conception of persons as "socially
constituted." It examines the communitarian objections to liberal
political theory and to the liberal conception of persons, the
"unencumbered self." The book differentiates between two types of
objection to the liberal conception of persons: the metaphysical
and normative. It explains Rawls's political conception of persons,
and the metaphysical and normative commitments Rawls incurs-and
does not incur-in virtue of that conception. It shows that both
kind of objection to Rawls's political conception of the person
fail. Finally, modifying Rawls's political conception of the
person, a Rawlsian conception of political identity is explained
and defended.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!