Books > History > American history
|
Buy Now
The Paradox of Power - Sino-American Strategic Restraint in an Age of Vulnerability (Paperback)
Loot Price: R607
Discovery Miles 6 070
|
|
The Paradox of Power - Sino-American Strategic Restraint in an Age of Vulnerability (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Published by the National Defense University, Institute for
National Strategic Studies, Center for the Study of Chinese
Military Affairs. From the foreword by Hans Binnendijk: "The first
half of the 21st century will be dominated by the relationship
between the United States and China. That relationship is likely to
contain elements of both cooperation and competition. Territorial
disputes such as those over Taiwan and the South China Sea will be
an important feature of this competition, but both are traditional
disputes, and traditional solutions suggest themselves. A more
difficult set of issues relates to U.S.-Chinese competition and
cooperation in three domains in which real strategic harm can be
inflicted in the current era: nuclear, space, and cyber. Just as a
clearer understanding of the fundamental principles of nuclear
deterrence maintained adequate stability during the Cold War, a
clearer understanding of the characteristics of these three domains
can provide the underpinnings of strategic stability between the
United States and China in the decades ahead. That is what this
book is about. David Gompert and Phillip Saunders assess the
prospect of U.S.- Chinese competition in these domains and develop
three related analytic findings upon which their recommendations
are built. The first is that in each domain, the offense is
dominant. The second is that each side will be highly vulnerable to
a strike from the other side. And the third is that the retaliating
side will still be able to do unacceptable damage to the initiating
party. Therefore, the authors make an important recommendation:
that the United States propose a comprehensive approach based on
mutual restraint whereby it and China can mitigate their growing
strategic vulnerabilities. Unlike the Cold War, this mutual
restraint regime may not take the form of binding treaties. But
patterns of understanding and restraint may be enough to maintain
stability."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.