In this analysis of naval arms control between the two world
wars, Emily Goldman dissects the underlying assumptions of arms
control theory that have guided theorizing and practice for the
past thirty years. She concludes that because there has been a
near-exclusive focus on the behavior of the superpowers and on the
consequences of nuclear technology, the arms control process has
been artificially constrained in its scope and potential. Returning
to the most important historical precedent of arms control prior to
the Cold War, Goldman demonstrates that there are two distinct
strategies of arms control, one that integrates force limitation
with political conflict resolution and one that confines itself to
technical limitations exclusively.
Goldman's is the first analytical treatment of the interwar
period that examines arms control in both its technical and
conflict-resolution dimensions in tandem and traces them through
the entire life of the arms control system. By debunking Cold War
orthodoxy about arms control and by illuminating how arms control
functioned between the wars, Goldman shows how the process of arms
control can transcend the narrow goal of regulating the military
balance and become a constructive tool for restructuring power
relationships.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!