0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Slavery & emancipation

Buy Now

Dred Scott and the Dangers of a Political Court (Hardcover) Loot Price: R3,009
Discovery Miles 30 090
Dred Scott and the Dangers of a Political Court (Hardcover): Ethan Greenberg

Dred Scott and the Dangers of a Political Court (Hardcover)

Ethan Greenberg

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R3,009 Discovery Miles 30 090 | Repayment Terms: R282 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days

The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is widely (and correctly) regarded as the very worst in the long history of the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision held that no African American could ever be a U.S. citizen and declared that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional and void. The decision thus appeared to promise that slavery would be forever protected in the great American West. Prompting mass outrage, the decision was a crucial step on the road that led to the Civil War. Dred Scott and the Dangers of a Political Court traces the history of the case and tells the story of many of the key people involved, including Dred and Harriet Scott, President James Buchanan, Chief Justice Roger Taney, and Abraham Lincoln. The book also examines in some detail each of the nine separate Opinions written by the Court's Justices, connecting each with the respective Justices' past views on slavery and the law. That examination demonstrates that the majority Justices were willing to embrace virtually any flimsy legal argument they could find at hand in an effort to justify the pro-slavery result they had predetermined. Many modern commentators view the case chiefly in relation to Roe v Wade and related controversies in modern constitutional law: some conservative critics attempt to argue that Dred Scott exemplifies "aspirationalism" or "judicial activism" gone wrong; some liberal critics in turn try to argue that Dred Scott instead represents "originalism" or "strict constructionism" run amok. Here, Judge Ethan Greenberg demonstrates that none of these modern critiques has much merit. The Dred Scott case was not about constitutional methodology, but chiefly about slavery, and about how very far the Dred Scott Court was willing to go to protect the political interests of the slave-holding South. The decision was wrong because the Court subordinated law and intellectual honesty to politics. The case thus exemplifies the dangers of a political Court.

General

Imprint: Lexington Books
Country of origin: United States
Release date: November 2009
First published: December 2009
Authors: Ethan Greenberg
Dimensions: 241 x 161 x 29mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 340
ISBN-13: 978-0-7391-3758-1
Categories: Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Slavery & emancipation
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Constitutional & administrative law > General
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights > Civil rights & citizenship
Promotions
LSN: 0-7391-3758-1
Barcode: 9780739137581

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners