Recent archaeological theory has show that images of the past
have carried a particularly strong resonance within modern social
groups. This volume explores the immeasurable impact that the
phenomenon of archaeology has had on the representation of the past
in the modern world. Modern society s archaeological imagination
conceives of archaeology as a producer of images of the past which
become representations of modern group identities. If archaeology
is utilized by public groups to construct and represent identities,
then what are archaeologists to do with that public? The very fact
that the public is interested in the past and in archaeological
research is an opportunity for archaeology to engage that
public.
Participation in the public s modern interest in archaeology,
however, puts archaeology at risk. The growing role of archaeology
and heritage within the economics of tourism, has led to a
commodification of archaeological knowledge and experience for
consumption. This volume begins a discourse on the implications of
performing archaeology in a world dominated by modern trends of
mass production, mass replication and representation of cultural
forms and mass consumption of images of the past. The contributors
explore to what extent we are experiencing a crisis of
representation of the past due to contemporary consumption of
mass-produced replicas, simulations, images and experiences of the
past.
To work through this crisis the contributors in this volume are
exploring opportunities for development within archaeological
thought and practice. Their arguments illustrate a move towards
active, participatory and poetic archaeological thought and
practice. Rather than focusing on what is produced through process
(artifacts, monuments, interpretive centers, etc.), they are
concerned with what they are doing, about taking part, about
participating reflexively in the tradition of understanding and
expressing understanding of the past. This volume does not conjure
up romantic beliefs about the project of archaeology, but rather,
it signals a fundamental revision of archaeology - not what it is,
but what it can do.
"
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!