This is one of the most important studies in decades on Johannes
Kepler, among the towering figures in the history of astronomy.
Drawing extensively on Kepler's correspondence and manuscripts,
James Voelkel reveals that the strikingly unusual style of Kepler's
magnum opus, "Astronomia nova" (1609), has been traditionally
misinterpreted. Kepler laid forth the first two of his three laws
of planetary motion in this work. Instead of a straightforward
presentation of his results, however, he led readers on a wild
goose chase, recounting the many errors and false starts he had
experienced. This had long been deemed a ''confessional'' mirror of
the daunting technical obstacles Kepler faced. As Voelkel amply
demonstrates, it is not.
Voelkel argues that Kepler's style can be understood only in the
context of the circumstances in which the book was written.
Starting with Kepler's earliest writings, he traces the development
of the astronomer's ideas of how the planets were moved by a force
from the sun and how this could be expressed mathematically. And he
shows how Kepler's once broader research program was diverted to a
detailed examination of the motion of Mars. Above all, Voelkel
shows that Kepler was well aware of the harsh reception his work
would receive--both from Tycho Brahe's heirs and from contemporary
astronomers; and how this led him to an avowedly rhetorical
pseudo-historical presentation of his results. In treating Kepler
at last as a figure in time and not as independent of it, this work
will be welcomed by historians of science, astronomers, and
historians.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!