Books > Language & Literature > Literature: history & criticism > Poetry & poets
|
Buy Now
American Errancy - Empire, Sublimity and Modern Poetry (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R1,317
Discovery Miles 13 170
|
|
American Errancy - Empire, Sublimity and Modern Poetry (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Donate to Against Period Poverty
Total price: R1,327
Discovery Miles: 13 270
|
American Errancy is a wide-ranging study of the connection between
ideology and the sublime in the work of twentieth-century poets,
all American with two, or perhaps three important exceptions. The
poets chosen are in debate with the Romantic individualism of
Emerson - some reject it outright, but the remainder have devoted
substantial work to adjusting to the changed circumstances of their
century. The link between Romantic individualism and ideological
contexts has preoccupied much criticism of American literature in
the last twenty years. For the most part, critics arraign this
tradition, suggesting that the writers abscond from difficult
political dilemmas to the realm of transcendence. In consequence,
the sublime as category for thinking about literary texts has been
largely abandoned. Emerson's transcendence is considered at best
naive, at worst as providing the nascent corporate capitalism of
the late nineteenth century with an iconography with which to
execute its agenda. Justin Quinn argues that this critical approach
distorts the achievement of poets in the twentieth century: many of
the poets discussed extend the tradition of Romantic individualism,
but they are not ideologically naive in the above sense. Their work
anticipated historicist criticism of the 1980s and 1990s as they
began to 'socialise' the sublime, and to explore the ways in which
the inheritance of Romantic individualism could engage with
ideological contexts. For some of the poets, these explorations
supported their oppositional politics (i.e., Allen Ginsberg); for
others, paradoxically, the explorations supported conservative
politics (i.e., A. R. Ammons); others rejected the Emersonian
inheritance outright (Eliot, Hill), but that rejection itself has
left an enduring mark on their work.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.