Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present > Western philosophy, from c 1900 -
|
Buy Now
Rethinking Descartes's Substance Dualism (Hardcover, 1st ed. 2021)
Loot Price: R3,424
Discovery Miles 34 240
|
|
Rethinking Descartes's Substance Dualism (Hardcover, 1st ed. 2021)
Series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, 29
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
This monograph presents an interpretation of Descartes's dualism,
which differs from the standard reading called 'classical
separatist dualism' claiming that the mind can exist without the
body. It argues that, contrary to what it is commonly claimed,
Descartes's texts suggest an emergent creationist substance
dualism, according to which the mind is a nonphysical substance
(created and maintained by God), which cannot begin to think
without a well-disposed body. According to this interpretation,
God's laws of nature endow each human body with the power to be
united to an immaterial soul. While the soul does not directly come
from the body, the mind can be said to emerge from the body in the
sense that it cannot be created by God independently from the body.
The divine creation of a human mind requires a well-disposed body,
a physical categorical basis. This kind of emergentism is
consistent with creationism and does not necessarily entail that
the mind cannot survive the body. This early modern view has some
connections with Hasker's substance emergent dualism (1999).
Indeed, Hasker states that the mind is a substance emerging at one
time from neurons and that consciousness has causal powers which
effects cannot be explained by physical neurons. An emergent
unified self-existing entity emerges from the brain on which it
acts upon. For its proponents, Hasker's view explains what
Descartes's dualism fails to explain, especially why the mind
regularly interacts with one and only one body. After questioning
the notion of emergence, the author argues that the theory of
emergent creationist substance dualism that she attributes to
Descartes is a more appropriate alternative because it faces fewer
problems than its rivals. This monograph is valuable for anyone
interested in the history of early modern philosophy and
contemporary philosophy of mind.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.