During the 1990s, the United States encountered an unprecedented
economic upsurge. The duration and scope of this boom led many
policymakers in D.C., to believe they had finally found a magic
formula for sustained economic growth and seamless national
development. Labeled the Washington Consensus, this free-market
approach was a shift away from regulation and government
intervention toward allowing the markets work themselves out on a
global level. Was it magic?
After all, this was an era where the markets for goods,
services, capital, and labor burst forth from North America,
Western Europe, and Japan to stretch across the globe. The Soviet
Union had collapsed and East and Southeast Asian economies were
flourishing. "Globalization and A New World Order" became the
slogans of the day.
In what some scholars and policymakers view as a massive social
experiment, the U.S. Treasury and the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) began leaning on Latin American countries to dismantle their
economic regime of import substitution industrialization (ISI).
Without a firm understanding of the complexities involved,
international lenders pressed for implementation of the Washington
Consensus advocating governments to step out of the way and let the
markets do their work.
Yet every nation has a different history when it comes to the
process of market creation. The attempt to apply a blanket formula
on countries with divergent political, social, and cultural
legacies flopped miserably. Supporters of the Washington Consensus
discovered their magic formula was merely a myth.
Although Chile, which already had strong institutional
foundations, came closest to succeeding in the implementation of
the Washington Consensus, places like Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, and
Argentina met with political and economical turmoil that shook
their countries to the core.
Pulling from a wellspring of knowledge, expertise, and
experience from representatives of sociology, economics,
demography, anthropology, and urban studies, this special issue of
"The ANNALS" provides a coherent chain of evidence that reveals how
the idea for structural adjustment in Latin America arose, how it
was applied, the negative consequences it had, and the lessons
learned.
Sprung from a request by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation on
"Urban Studies and Demography," this collection of
thought-provoking articles is the result of a two-year pilot
research project conducted by faculty and students affiliated with
the Population Studies Center and the Urban Studies program at the
University of Pennsylvania.
Students, researchers, and policymakers in public affairs,
economics, anthropology, international affairs, sociology, urban
studies, population studies, and others will gain clarity and
insight into this complex phase of world economic history."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!