The American public has consistently declared itself less
concerned with foreign affairs in the post-Cold War era, even after
9/11, than at any time since World War II. How can it be, then,
that public attentiveness to U.S. foreign policy crises has
increased? This book represents the first systematic attempt to
explain this apparent paradox. Matthew Baum argues that the answer
lies in changes to television's presentation of political
information. In so doing he develops a compelling "byproduct"
theory of information consumption. The information revolution has
fundamentally changed the way the mass media, especially
television, covers foreign policy. Traditional news has been
repackaged into numerous entertainment-oriented news programs and
talk shows. By transforming political issues involving scandal or
violence (especially attacks against America) into entertainment,
the "soft news" media have actually captured more viewers who will
now follow news about foreign crises, due to its entertainment
value, even if they remain uninterested in foreign policy.
Baum rigorously tests his theory through content analyses of
traditional and soft news media coverage of various post-WWII U.S.
foreign crises and statistical analyses of public opinion surveys.
The results hold key implications for the future of American
politics and foreign policy. For instance, watching soft news
reinforces isolationism among many inattentive Americans. Scholars,
political analysts, and even politicians have tended to ignore the
soft news media and politically disengaged citizens. But, as this
well-written book cogently demonstrates, soft news viewers
represent a largely untapped reservoir of unusually persuadable
voters.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!