Books > Language & Literature > Language teaching & learning (other than ELT) > Specific skills > Speaking / pronunciation skills
|
Buy Now
Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject (Paperback)
Loot Price: R821
Discovery Miles 8 210
|
|
Telicity and the Syntax-Semantics of the Object and Subject (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
This dissertation presents a study on the acquisition of telicity
by Spanish and English native speakers. In addition to the study of
acquisition, it investigates the syntactic and semantic properties
of locatum constructions (e.g., the water filled the bucket), which
are sentences that contain two internal arguments and whose subject
is non-agentive. This dissertation explores the syntactic and
semantic properties of elements of the verb phrase that had not
been previously considered in the interpretation of telicity, such
as the role of non-agentive subjects and the type of movement that
takes place in the checking of the verb's telic features.Contrary
to the assumption that only the direct internal argument of the
verb can delimit an event, I argue that objects generated in the
lower verb phrase, by virtue of being an internal argument of the
verb can delimit an event. An object delimits an event by checking
the verb's telic features in spec-AspP, either by covert or overt
movement. If a predicate contains one internal argument (e.g., the
boy filled the bucket) the checking of the verb's telic features
takes place via covert movement. That is, only the NPs specific
quantification features move covertly to check the verb's telic
features in spec-AspP. However, if the predicate contains two
internal arguments (e.g., fill the bucket with water), the surfaced
subject (e.g., the water filled the bucket) by virtue of being an
internal argument of the verb, checks the verb's telic features as
the category and its features move overtly to subject position.The
study shows that young children understand telicity when the verb's
telic features are checked via overt movement, but have
difficulties understanding telicity when the verb's telic features
are checked via covert movement. I propose that predicates whose
telicity involves overt movement should be acquired earlier than
predicates whose telicity involves covert movement because overt
movement is an operation that happens between D-structure and
S-structure before the sentence is pronounced. Predicates whose
telicity involves covert movement might be acquired at a later age
of development because covert movement happens between S-structure
and LF after the sentence is pronounced.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.