The original essays in this volume, while written from diverse
perspectives, share the common aim of building a constructive
dialogue between two currents in philosophy that seem not readily
allied: Wittgenstein, who urges us to bring our words back home to
their ordinary uses, recognizing that it is our agreements in
judgments and forms of life that ground intelligibility; and
feminist theory, whose task is to articulate a radical critique of
what we say, to disrupt precisely those taken-for-granted
agreements in judgments and forms of life.
Wittgenstein and feminist theorists are alike, however, in being
unwilling or unable to "make sense" in the terms of the traditions
from which they come, needing to rely on other means--including
telling stories about everyday life--to change our ideas of what
sense is and of what it is to make it. For both, appeal to
grounding is problematic, but the presumed groundedness of
particular judgments remains an unavoidable feature of discourse
and, as such, in need of understanding. For feminist theory,
Wittgenstein suggests responses to the immobilizing tugs between
modernist modes of theorizing and postmodern challenges to them.
For Wittgenstein, feminist theory suggests responses to those who
would turn him into the "normal" philosopher he dreaded becoming,
one who offers perhaps unorthodox solutions to recognizable
philosophical problems.
In addition to an introductory essay by Naomi Scheman, the
volume's twenty chapters are grouped in sections titled "The
Subject of Philosophy and the Philosophical Subject,"
"Wittgensteinian Feminist Philosophy: Contrasting Visions,"
"Drawing Boundaries: Categories and Kinds," "Being Human: Agents
and Subjects," and "Feminism's Allies: New Players, New Games."
These essays give us ways of understanding Wittgenstein and
feminist theory that make the alliance a mutually fruitful one,
even as they bring to their readings of Wittgenstein an explicitly
historical and political perspective that is, at best, implicit in
his work. The recent salutary turn in (analytic) philosophy toward
taking history seriously has shown how the apparently timeless
problems of supposedly generic subjects arose out of historically
specific circumstances. These essays shed light on the task of
feminist theorists--along with postcolonial, queer, and critical
race theorists--to (in Wittgenstein's words) "rotate the axis of
our examination" around whatever "real need s]" might emerge
through the struggles of modernity's Others.
Contributors (besides the editors) are Nancy E. Baker, Nalini
Bhushan, Jane Braaten, Judith Bradford, Sandra W. Churchill, Daniel
Cohen, Tim Craker, Alice Crary, Susan Hekman, Cressida J. Heyes,
Sarah Lucia Hoagland, Christine M. Koggel, Bruce Krajewski, Wendy
Lynne Lee, Hilda Lindemann Nelson, Deborah Orr, Rupert Read,
Phyllis Rooney, and Janet Farrell Smith.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!