As this edited collection makes clear, inquiry is a social
system and knowledge is socially constructed. To understand the
nature of inquiry in a particular discourse community, one must
look at its social dimensions, that is, the qualities of personal
craftsmanship and community affiliation inherent in the work of the
writers/scholars. And, of course, each discourse community
maintains its own standards and norms, determines what subject
matter is appropriate for investigation and explanation, how that
subject matter is examined, what constitutes evidence, and, in
discourse, what claims are to be regarded as valid. McInnis and his
contributors explore how a consensus was arrived at in various
Western disciplines and how that consensus has stood up to
challenges through time.
They first examine the concepts of consensus/dissensus and the
politics of scholarship in a variety disciplines, concentrating on
economic history, health and medicine. They next look at
contrasting conceptual frameworks for synthesizing discourse within
disciplines and the challenges established in the world of
postmodernist scholarship. Reference works are then explored as
tools for discourse synthesis and consensus, and the volume
concludes with a look at micro and macro considerations in
discourse synthesis. A provocative work for scholars and
researchers involved in the philosophy and history of knowledge and
science; advanced students in a variety of disciplines will find
the work invaluable for better understanding the roots, rules, and
approaches of their specialized fields.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!