The higher-order evidence debate concerns how higher-order evidence
affects the rationality of our first-order beliefs. This Element
has two parts. The first part (Sections 1 and 2) provides a
critical overview of the literature, aiming to explain why the
higher-order evidence debate is interesting and important. The
second part (Sections 3 to 6) defends calibrationism, the view that
we should respond to higher-order evidence by aligning our
credences to our reliability degree. The author first discusses the
traditional version of calibrationism and explains its main
difficulties, before proposing a new version of calibrationism
called 'Evidence-Discounting Calibrationism.' The Element argues
that this new version is independently plausible and that it can
avoid the difficulties faced by the traditional version.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!