In simple action theory, when people choose between courses of
action, they know what the outcome will be. When an individual is
making a choice "against nature," such as switching on a light,
that assumption may hold true. But in strategic interaction
outcomes, indeterminacy is pervasive and often intractable. Whether
one is choosing for oneself or making a choice about a policy
matter, it is usually possible only to make a guess about the
outcome, one based on anticipating what other actors will do. In
this book Russell Hardin asserts, in his characteristically clear
and uncompromising prose, "Indeterminacy in contexts of strategic
interaction . . . Is an issue that is constantly swept under the
rug because it is often disruptive to pristine social theory. But
the theory is fake: the indeterminacy is real."
In the course of the book, Hardin thus outlines the various ways
in which theorists from Hobbes to Rawls have gone wrong in denying
or ignoring indeterminacy, and suggests how social theories would
be enhanced--and how certain problems could be resolved effectively
or successfully--if they assumed from the beginning that
indeterminacy was the normal state of affairs, not the exception.
Representing a bold challenge to widely held theoretical
assumptions and habits of thought, "Indeterminacy and Society" will
be debated across a range of fields including politics, law,
philosophy, economics, and business management.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!