|
|
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure
This book presents a short history and timeline of criminal
procedure legislation in China. First, it addresses the status of
Human Rights Conventions and the challenges resulting from human
rights standards for Chinese criminal procedural law and practice.
The discussion then moves on to explore the fundaments of Chinese
criminal procedure such as the applicable law found in the Chinese
CPL (Criminal Procedure Law) and legal institutions. The book
covers relevant actors in the Chinese Criminal Justice System (ie
judges, prosecutors, police, defence councils) as well as the
relationships between them. It also includes topics relating to the
victims of crime and their role in criminal proceedings. Starting
with pre-trial investigations (extending in particular to coercive
measures and discretionary powers in the implementation of
non-prosecution policies) the book continues as a guide through the
basic principles of criminal trial, standards of evidence and rules
related to conviction. Appeals and the issue of reopening criminal
proceedings are also considered, with the book making particular
reference to a number of special procedures (including juvenile
delinquency) in the closing chapter.
The civil justice system is characterized by a distinct dispute
resolution and law enforcement functions, although these functions
are not always explicit and their relationship can be vague. People
normally turn to this legal system to address an ""unjust""
situation they encounter. This makes civil justice both socially
and economically important, as it may be driven by efficiency or
access to justice concerns. The literature suggests that law reform
has an uninspiring record in this field. This is because it has,
largely, not been considered with a detailed, empirically informed
evaluation of proposed solutions. This legal system is complex, and
research in this field is correspondingly challenging, interesting,
and important. The Handbook of Research on Civil Justice provides
significant empirical research findings as well as theoretical
reviews and frameworks on a wide array of issues within civil
justice and the legal system. This includes topic areas such as
access to justice and legal representation, the challenges to
developing civil justice, courts and procedures, and civil justice
reform. This book is valuable for lawyers, human rights lawyers,
court officials, psychologists, social workers, sociologists,
consultants, professionals, academicians, students, and researchers
working in the field of law, socio-legal studies, sociology,
anthropology, political science, social work, social policy,
economics, and criminal justice, along with anyone seeking updated
information on the current reforms and challenges within the civil
justice and legal systems.
The phenomenal growth of penal confinement in the United States in
the last quarter of the twentieth century is still a public policy
mystery. While there is unanimous condemnation of the practice,
there is no consensus on the causes nor any persuasive analysis of
what is likely to happen in the coming decades. In The Insidious
Momentum of American Mass Incarceration, Franklin E. Zimring seeks
a comprehensive understanding of when, how, and why the United
States became the world leader in incarceration to further
determine how the use of confinement can realistically be reduced.
To do this, Zimring first profiles the growth of imprisonment after
1970, emphasizing the important roles of both the federal system
and the distribution of power and fiscal responsibility among the
levels of government in American states. He also examines the
changes in law enforcement, prosecution and criminal sentencing
that ignited the 400% increase in rates of imprisonment in the
single generation after 1975. Finally, Zimring then proposes a
range of strategies that can reduce prison population and promote
rational policies of criminal punishment. Arguing that the most
powerful enemy to reducing excess incarceration is simply the
mundane features of state and local government, such as elections
of prosecutors and state support for prison budgets, this book
challenges the convential ways we consider the issue of mass
incarceration in the United States and how we can combat the rising
numbers.
This addition to the Elements of International Law series explores
the role of international law as an integral part of the Russian
legal system, with particular reference to the role of
international treaties and of generally-recognized principles and
norms of international law. Following a discussion of the
historical place of treaties in Russian legal history and the
sources of the Russian law of treaties, the book strikes new ground
in exploring contemporary treaty-making in the Russian Federation
by drawing upon sources not believed to have been previously used
in Russian or western doctrinal writings. Special attention is
devoted to investment protection treaties. The importance of
publishing treaties as a condition of their application by Russian
courts is explored. For the first time a detailed account is given
of the constitutional history of treaty ratification in Russia, the
outcome being that present constitutional practice is inconsistent
with the drafting history of the relevant constitutional
provisions. The volume gives attention to the role of the Russian
Supreme Court in developing treaty practice through the issuance of
"guiding documents" binding on lower courts, the reaction of the
Russian Constitutional Court to judgments of the European Court of
Human Rights, and the place of treaties as an integral part of the
Russian legal system. Butler further explores the hierarchy of
sources of law, together with other facets of Russian arbitral and
judicial practice with respect to treaties and other sources of
international law. He concludes with a consideration of the
'generally-recognized principles and norms of international law'
and their role as part of the Russian system.
This book examines the interconnections between artificial
intelligence, data governance and private law rules with a
comparative focus on selected jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacific
region. The chapters discuss the myriad challenges of translating
and adapting theory, doctrines and concepts to practice in the
Asia-Pacific region given their differing circumstances, challenges
and national interests. The contributors are legal experts from the
UK, Israel, Korea, and Singapore with extensive academic and
practical experience. The essays in this collection cover a wide
range of topics, including data protection and governance, data
trusts, information fiduciaries, medical AI, the regulation of
autonomous vehicles, the use of blockchain technology in land
administration, the regulation of digital assets and contract
formation issues arising from AI applications. The book will be of
interest to members of the judiciary, policy makers and academics
who specialise in AI, data governance and/or private law or who
work at the intersection of these three areas, as well as legal
technologists and practising lawyers in the Asia-Pacific, the UK
and the US.
This is an ideal introductory book for the person who needs an
insight into how the English legal system functions at all levels
and a critical analysis of the shortcomings, with the views of
major figures in the legal world on how to change the system so
that it functions effectively.
This title is part of UC Press's Voices Revived program, which
commemorates University of California Press's mission to seek out
and cultivate the brightest minds and give them voice, reach, and
impact. Drawing on a backlist dating to 1893, Voices Revived makes
high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship accessible once again using
print-on-demand technology. This title was originally published in
1951.
This two-volume set examines the origins and growth of judicial
review in the key G-20 constitutional democracies, which include
the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan,
Italy, India, Canada, Australia, South Korea, Brazil, South Africa,
Indonesia, Mexico, and the European Union, as well as Israel. The
volumes consider five different theories, which help to explain the
origins of judicial review, and identify which theories apply best
in the various countries discussed. They consider not only what
gives rise to judicial review originally, but also what causes of
judicial review lead it to become more powerful and prominent over
time. Volume Two discusses the G-20 civil law countries.
This work provides important insights into how judges and
arbitrators resolve complex commercial disputes in both national
and international settings. The analysis is built from three major
research sources which ensures that the analysis can bridge
evidence of perception, behaviours, and outcomes amongst judges and
arbitrators. A statistical survey provides a benchmark and point of
comparison with the subjective statements arising from an extensive
programme of interviews and questionnaires to provide an objective
lens on the reasoning process that informs decisions and awards in
practice. The outcome, presented in Legal Reasoning across
Commercial Disputes, is an evidence-based model of the determining
factors in legal reasoning by identifying and quantifying
approximately seventy-five objective markers for which data can be
compared across the arbitral-judicial, domestic-international, and
common law-civil law divides. The methodology provides for a
thorough and contextual assessment of legal reasoning by judges and
arbitrators in commercial disputes. Legal Reasoning across
Commercial Disputes investigates the level of sophistication and
complexity associated with commercial arbitration relative to
commercial litigation through domestic courts. The study not only
helps parties make more informed choices about where and how to
resolve their legal disputes, it also assists judges and
arbitrators in carrying out their duties by improving counsel's
understanding about how to best to craft and present legal
arguments and submissions. The study also addresses longstanding
theoretical concerns about the legitimacy of national and
international commercial arbitration by replacing assumptions and
anecdotes with objective data. The final part of the book draws
together the various strands of analysis and concludes with a
number of forward-looking proposals about how a deeper
understanding of legal and judicial reasoning can be established to
improve the quality of decisions and outcomes for all parties.
The Dispute resolution digest 2012 is the product of 7 years of
continuous research by Tokiso into the labour dispute settlement
system of South Africa. The intention of the Digest is to give a
dispassionate account, based on statistical examination, of whether
the dispute mechanisms of the Labour Relations Act are functioning
effectively. The Digest considers types of labour disputes,
settlements, trends in remedies and awards, and compliance with
these awards. The disputes and awards are separated into their
sub-categories of type, sector and forum with some interesting
findings. Strikes, the most extreme form of labour action by
employees, are analysed by the number of strikes, effects of
strikes and the factors that trigger strikes.
An inside look at the struggles former prisoners face in reentering
society Every year, roughly 650,000 people prepare to reenter
society after being released from state and federal prisons. In
Halfway House, Liam Martin shines a light on their difficult
journeys, taking us behind the scenes at Bridge House, a
residential reentry program near Boston, Massachusetts. Drawing on
three years of research, Martin explores the obstacles these former
prisoners face in the real world. From drug addiction to poverty,
he captures the ups and downs of life after incarceration in vivid,
engaging detail. He shows us what, exactly, it is like to live in a
halfway house, giving us a rare, up-close view of its role in a
dense and often confusing web of organizations governing prisoner
reentry. Martin asks us to rethink the possibilities-and
pitfalls-of using halfway houses to manage the worst excesses of
mass incarceration. A portrait of life in the long shadow of the
carceral state, Halfway House lets us see the struggles of reentry
through the eyes of former prisoners.
|
|