|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Ethics & moral philosophy > Practical & applied ethics
Living in a world inundated with sexual images and messages, we're
tempted at every turn. While most people are familiar with the
Bible's clear admonitions concerning sexual practices such as
adultery and fornication, less attention is given to biblical
guidance in regard to the sexual activity exercised between husband
and wife. What does the Bible have to say about the way we practice
our sexuality? "Is God In Your Bedroom? Discovering the Joy of
Sanctified Sexuality" is a startling plunge into the Word of God,
revealing plain instruction from the Bible concerning God's
creative expression of unconditional love toward man-the gift of
sexuality. Learn the elements that define sacred sexuality, how to
protect your marriage from sinful practices, and strategies to help
restore relationships afflicted by infidelity. God created the
institution of marriage to be a living, vibrant representation of
the unity and oneness of God. Sexuality is a gift stemming from
that unity, allowing the sanctity of sexual expression to be
expressed within the covenant of marriage. Adhering to the desire
and will of God in sexual intimacy, our relationships will bear the
mark of God's favor and blessing. Find out how you can experience
God's choice blessing for your love life.
Originally published in 1952, al-Din, by prominent Egyptian scholar
Muhammad Abdullah Draz (1894-1958), has been critically acclaimed
as one of the most influential Arab Muslim studies of universal
'religion' and forms of religiosity in modern times. Written as an
introductory textbook for a course in the "History of Religions" at
King Fuad I University in Cairo-the first of its kind offered at an
Egyptian institution of higher learning-this book presents a
critical overview of classical approaches to the scholarly study of
religion. While ultimately adapted to an Islamic paradigm, the book
is a novel attempt to construct a grand narrative about the large
methodological issues of Religious Studies and the History of
Religions and in relation to modernity and secularism. Translated
for the first time in English by Yahya Haidar, this book
demonstrates how the scholarly academic study of religion in the
West, often described as 'Orientalist', came to influence and help
shape a counter-discourse from one of the leading Arab Muslim
scholars of his time.
Christianity is commonly held to have introduced an entirely new
and better morality into the ancient world, a new morality that was
decidedly universal, in contrast to the ethics of the philosophical
schools which were only concerned with the intellectual few. Runar
M. Thorsteinsson presents a challenge to this view by comparing
Christian morality in first-century Rome with contemporary Stoic
ethics in the city.
Thorsteinsson introduces and discusses the moral teaching of Roman
Stoicism; of Seneca, Musonius Rufus, and Epictetus. He then
presents the moral teaching of Roman Christianity as it is
represented in Paul's Letter to the Romans, the First Letter of
Peter, and the First Letter of Clement. Having established the
bases for his comparison, he examines the similarities and
differences between Roman Stoicism and Roman Christianity in terms
of morality.
Five broad themes are used for the comparison, questions of
Christian and Stoic views about: a particular morality or way of
life as proper worship of the deity; certain individuals (like
Jesus and Socrates) as paradigms for the proper way of life; the
importance of mutual love and care; non-retaliation and 'love of
enemies'; and the social dimension of ethics. This approach reveals
a fundamental similarity between the moral teachings of Roman
Christianity and Roman Stoicism. The most basic difference is found
in the ethical scope of the two: While the latter teaches
unqualified universal humanity, the former seems to condition the
ethical scope in terms of religious adherence.
Must religious voices keep quiet in public places? Does fairness in
a plural society require it? Must the expression of religious
belief be so authoritarian as to threaten civil peace? Do we need
translation into 'secular' language, or should we try to manage
polyglot conversation? How neutral is 'secular' language? Is a
religious argument necessarily unreasonable? What issues are
specific to Islam within this exchange?
These are just some of the pressing questions addressed by
Religious Voices in Public Places. Drawn from Australia, Canada,
France, Ireland and England-as well as the United States-thirteen
contributors take the long-running discussion about religion in the
public square beyond its usual American confines.
Religious Voices in Public Places comprehends both political
philosophy and theology, and moves adeptly between political theory
and practice. Whether offering critical analyses of key theorists
such as John Rawls, Jeffrey Stout and Jurgen Habermas, or pursuing
the issue of the public expression of religion into the debate
about religious education in the USA, the legalisation of
euthanasia in the UK, and human rights worldwide, this incisive
volume speaks directly into crucial areas of religious and
political complexity."
Neil Messer brings together a range of theoretical and practical
questions raised by current research on the human brain: questions
about both the 'ethics of neuroscience' and the 'neuroscience of
ethics'. While some of these are familiar to theologians, others
have been more or less ignored hitherto, and the field of
neuroethics as a whole has received little theological attention.
Drawing on both theological ethics and the science-and-theology
field, Messer discusses cognitive-scientific and neuroscientific
studies of religion, arguing that they do not give grounds to
dismiss theological perspectives on the human self. He examines a
representative range of topics across the whole field of
neuroethics, including consciousness, the self and the value of
human life; the neuroscience of morality; determinism, freewill and
moral responsibility; and the ethics of cognitive enhancement.
In Orthodoxy, Gilbert K. Chesterton explains how and why he came to
believe in Christianity and more specifically the Catholic Church's
brand of orthodoxy. In the book, Chesterton takes the spiritually
curious reader on an intellectual quest. While looking for the
meaning of life, he finds truth that uniquely fulfills human needs.
This is the truth revealed in Christianity. Chesterton likens this
discovery to a man setting off from the south coast of England,
journeying for many days, only to arrive at Brighton, the point he
originally left from. Such a man, he proposes, would see the
wondrous place he grew up in with newly appreciative eyes. This is
a common theme in Chesterton's works, and one which he gave
fictional embodiment to in Manalive. A truly lively and
enlightening book!
How does an understanding of the non-human lead us to a greater
understanding of the incarnation? Are non-human animals morally
relevant within Christian theology and ethics? Is there a human
ethical responsibility towards non-human animals? In Animals,
Theology and the Incarnation, Kris Hiuser argues that if we are
called to represent both God to creation, and creation to God, then
this has considerable bearing on understanding what it means to be
human, as well as informing human action towards non-human
creatures.
The Stoics are known to have been a decisive influence on early
Christian moral thought, but the import of this influence for
contemporary Christian ethics has been underexplored. Elizabeth
Agnew Cochran argues that attention to the Stoics enriches a
Christian understanding of the virtues, illuminating precisely how
historical Protestant theology gives rise to a distinctive virtue
ethic. Through examining the dialogue between Roman Stoic ethics
and the work of Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Jonathan Edwards,
Cochran illuminates key theological convictions that provide a
foundation for a contemporary Protestant virtue ethic, consistent
with theological beliefs characteristic of the historical Reformed
tradition.
Structured directly around the specification of the OCR, this is
the definitive textbook for students of Advanced Subsidiary or
Advanced Level courses. The updated third edition covers all the
necessary topics for Religious Ethics in an enjoyable
student-friendly fashion. Each chapter includes: a list of key
issues OCR specification checklist explanations of key terminology
overviews of key scholars and theories self-test review questions
exam practice questions. To maximise students' chances of success,
the book contains a section dedicated to answering examination
questions. It comes complete with diagrams and tables, lively
illustrations, a comprehensive glossary and full bibliography.
Additional resources are available via the companion website.
In this brilliant theological essay, Paul J. Griffiths takes the
reader through all the stages of regret. To various degrees, all
human beings experience regret. In this concise theological
grammar, Paul J. Griffiths analyzes this attitude toward the past
and distinguishes its various kinds. He examines attitudes
encapsulated in the phrase, "I would it were otherwise," including
regret, contrition, remorse, compunction, lament, and repentance.
By using literature (especially poetry) and Christian theology,
Griffiths shows both what is good about regret and what can be
destructive about it. Griffiths argues that on the one hand regret
can take the form of remorse-an agony produced by obsessive and
ceaseless examination of the errors, sins, and omissions of the
past. This kind of regret accomplishes nothing and produces only
pain. On the other hand, when regret is coupled with contrition and
genuine sorrow for past errors, it has the capacity both to
transfigure the past-which is never merely past-and to open the
future. Moreover, in thinking about the phenomenon of regret in the
context of Christian theology, Griffiths focuses especially on the
notion of the LORD's regret. Is it even reasonable to claim that
the LORD regrets? Griffiths shows not only that it is but also that
the LORD's regret should structure how we regret as human beings.
Griffiths investigates the work of Henry James, Emily Dickinson,
Tomas Transtroemer, Paul Celan, Jane Austen, George Herbert, and
Robert Frost to show how regret is not a negative feature of human
life but rather is essential for human flourishing and ultimately
is to be patterned on the LORD's regret. Regret: A Theology will be
of interest to scholars and students of philosophy, theology, and
literature, as well as to literate readers who want to understand
the phenomenon of regret more deeply.
 |
Living in The Story
(Hardcover)
Charlotte Vaughan Coyle; Foreword by M. Eugene Boring
|
R1,153
R976
Discovery Miles 9 760
Save R177 (15%)
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
2014 Outreach Magazine Resource of the Year ("Also Recommended,"
Justice) Slavery didn't end in 1833, when William Wilberforce's
decades-long campaign finally resulted in the Slavery Abolition
Act. It didn't end in 1863, when Abraham Lincoln signed the
Emancipation Proclamation. It didn't end in 1949, when the United
Nations declared trafficking "incompatible with the dignity and
worth of the human person." The sad truth is, slavery never ended.
It just went underground, where it continues to exploit powerless
men, women and children in horrific ways throughout the world. Now
for the good news: you have power. In Refuse to Do Nothing,
"Abolitionist Mamas" Shayne Moore and Kimberly Yim share their
stories of coming to terms with the power available to them in
their normal, everyday lives to illuminate the shadows where those
who traffic in people hide compel corporations to fight slavery in
how their products are made motivate politicians to fight for human
dignity mobilize friends and strangers alike to fight slavery at
home and throughout the world Slavery doesn't end without a fight.
But get to know Shayne and Kimberly and their abolitionist friends,
and you'll find the power God grants to all who fight for the
powerless, and the joy awaiting those who refuse to do nothing.
|
|