Books > History > World history > From 1900 > First World War
|
Buy Now
Too Important for the Generals - Losing and Winning the First World War (Paperback)
Loot Price: R321
Discovery Miles 3 210
You Save: R72
(18%)
|
|
Too Important for the Generals - Losing and Winning the First World War (Paperback)
(1 rating, sign in to rate)
List price R393
Loot Price R321
Discovery Miles 3 210
You Save R72 (18%)
Expected to ship within 9 - 15 working days
|
'War is too important to be left to the generals' snapped future
French prime minister Georges Clemenceau on learning of yet another
bloody and futile offensive on the Western Front. One of the great
questions in the ongoing discussions and debate about the First
World War is why did winning take so long and exact so appalling a
human cost? After all this was a fight that, we were told, would be
over by Christmas. Now, in his major new history, Allan Mallinson,
former professional soldier and author of the acclaimed 1914: Fight
the Good Fight, provides answers that are disturbing as well as
controversial, and have a contemporary resonance. He disputes the
growing consensus among historians that British generals were not
to blame for the losses and setbacks in the 'war to end all wars' -
that, given the magnitude of their task, they did as well anyone
could have. He takes issue with the popular view that the 'amateur'
opinions on strategy of politicians such as Lloyd George and,
especially, Winston Churchill, prolonged the war and increased the
death toll. On the contrary, he argues, even before the war began
Churchill had a far more realistic, intelligent and humane grasp of
strategy than any of the admirals or generals, while very few
senior officers - including Sir Douglas Haig - were up to the
intellectual challenge of waging war on this scale. And he
repudiates the received notion that Churchill's stature as a
wartime prime minister after 1940 owes much to the lessons he
learned from his First World War 'mistakes' - notably the
Dardanelles campaign - maintaining that in fact Churchill's
achievement in the Second World War owes much to the thwarting of
his better strategic judgement by the 'professionals' in the First
- and his determination that this would not be repeated. Mallinson
argues that from day one of the war Britain was wrong-footed by
absurdly faulty French military doctrine and paid, as a result, an
unnecessarily high price in casualties. He shows that Lloyd George
understood only too well the catastrophically dysfunctional
condition of military policy-making and struggled against the
weight of military opposition to fix it. And he asserts that both
the British and the French failed to appreciate what the Americans'
contribution to victory could be - and, after the war, to
acknowledge fully what it had actually been.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.