Books > Earth & environment > Regional & area planning > Urban & municipal planning
|
Buy Now
The Grasping Hand (Hardcover, First Edition, Enlarged Ed.)
Loot Price: R893
Discovery Miles 8 930
|
|
The Grasping Hand (Hardcover, First Edition, Enlarged Ed.)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
On June 23, 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New
London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties
in the Fort Trumbull area and transfer them to a new private owner.
The use of eminent domain to take private property for public works
is generally considered a permissible "public use" under the Fifth
Amendment. In New London, however, the land was condemned to
promote private "economic development." Ilya Somin argues that Kelo
represents a serious - and dangerous-error. Not only are economic
development and closely related blight condemnations
unconstitutional under most theories of legal interpretation, they
also tend to victimize the poor and the politically weak, and to
destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo exemplifies
these patterns: the neighbors who chose to fight their evictions
had little political power, while the influential Pfizer
Corporation played an important role in persuading officials to
proceed with the project. In the end, the poorly conceived
development plan failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day.
A notably unpopular verdict, Kelo triggered an unprecedented
political backlash, with forty-five states passing new laws
intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new
state laws turned out to impose few or no genuine constraints. The
Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much
as it would first appear. Despite its outcome, the closely divided
ruling in Kelo shattered what many believed to be a consensus that
virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use. With
controversy over this issue sure to continue, The Grasping Hand
offers an analysis of the case alongside a history of the meaning
of public use and the use of eminent domain and an evaluation of
options for reform.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.