In his "Problemata," Aristotle provided medieval thinkers with
the occasion to inquire into the natural causes of the sexual
desires of men to act upon or be acted upon by other men, thus
bringing human sexuality into the purview of natural philosophers,
whose aim it was to explain the causes of objects and events in
nature. With this philosophical justification, some late medieval
intellectuals asked whether such dispositions might arise from
anatomy or from the psychological processes of habit formation. As
the fourteenth-century philosopher Walter Burley observed, "Nothing
natural is shameful." The authors, scribes, and readers willing to
"contemplate base things" never argued that they were not vile, but
most did share the conviction that they could be explained.From the
evidence that has survived in manuscripts of and related to the
"Problemata," two narratives emerge: a chronicle of the earnest
attempts of medieval medical theorists and natural philosophers to
understand the cause of homosexual desires and pleasures in terms
of natural processes, and an ongoing debate as to whether the
sciences were equipped or permitted to deal with such subjects at
all. Mining hundreds of texts and deciphering commentaries,
indices, abbreviations, and marginalia, Joan Cadden shows how
European scholars deployed a standard set of philosophical tools
and a variety of rhetorical strategies to produce scientific
approaches to sodomy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!