For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good
reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent
years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians
have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this
change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in
attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the
recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either
internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted
findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How is
logical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an
inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent
theories be considered as true?
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this
kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as
philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the
different approaches in the domain.
General
Imprint: |
Springer-Verlag New York
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Series: |
Origins: Studies in the Sources of Scientific Creativity, 2 |
Release date: |
May 2002 |
First published: |
2002 |
Editors: |
Joke Meheus
|
Dimensions: |
235 x 155 x 14mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Hardcover
|
Pages: |
223 |
Edition: |
2002 ed. |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-4020-0630-2 |
Categories: |
Books >
Science & Mathematics >
Science: general issues >
Philosophy of science
|
LSN: |
1-4020-0630-6 |
Barcode: |
9781402006302 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!