Is the current international legal regime capable of deterring
and stopping mass atrocities? Recent events in Darfur again raise
this familiar question of whether international law facilitates the
kind of early, decisive, and coherent action --especially with
respect to military force --needed to combat genocide
effectively.
In this report, Matthew C. Waxman argues that an international
legal regime that puts decisions about international intervention
solely in the hands of the UN Security Council risks undermining
the threat or use of intervention when it may be most potent in
stopping mass atrocities. The features of the UN Charter that help
resolve security crises peacefully make it difficult to generate
the rapid action needed to deter or roll them back. Waxman urges
the United States and other Security Council members to take steps
to improve the responsiveness of the existing Security Council. He
insists that they signal the willingness, if the UN fails to act in
future mass atrocity crises, to take the necessary action to
address them.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!