"Composition in the University" examines the required
introductory course in composition within American colleges and
universities. Crowley argues that due to its association with
literary studies in English departments, composition instruction
has been inappropriately influenced by humanist pedagogy and that
modern humanism is not a satisfactory rationale for the study of
writing. Crowley envisions possible nonhumanist rationales that
could be developed for vertical curricula in writing instruction,
were the universal requirement not in place.
"Composition in the University" examines the required
introductory course in composition within American colleges and
universities. According to Sharon Crowley, the required composition
course has never been conceived in the way that other introductory
courses have been--as an introduction to the principles and
practices of a field of study. Rather it has been constructed
throughout much of its history as a site from which larger
educational and ideological agendas could be advanced, and such
agendas have not always served the interests of students or
teachers, even though they are usually touted as programs of study
that students "need."
If there is a master narrative of the history of composition, it is
told in the institutional attitude that has governed
administration, design, and staffing of the course from its
beginnings--the attitude that the universal requirement is in place
in order to construct docile academic subjects.
Crowley argues that due to its association with literary studies
in English departments, composition instruction has been
inappropriately influenced by humanist pedagogy and that modern
humanism is not a satisfactory rationale for the study of writing.
She examines historical attempts to reconfigure the required course
in nonhumanist terms, such as the advent of communications studies
during the 1940s. Crowley devotes two essays to this phenomenon,
concentrating on the furor caused by the adoption of a
communications program at the University of Iowa.
"Composition in the University" concludes with a pair of essays
that argue against maintenance of the universal requirement. In the
last of these, Crowley envisions possible nonhumanist rationales
that could be developed for vertical curricula in writing
instruction, were the universal requirement not in place.
Crowley presents her findings in a series of essays because she
feels the history of the required composition course cannot easily
be understood as a coherent narrative since understandings of the
purpose of the required course have altered rapidly from decade to
decade, sometimes in shockingly sudden and erratic fashion.
The essays in this book are informed by Crowley's long career of
teaching composition, administering a composition program, and
training teachers of the required introductory course. The book
also draw on experience she gained while working with committees
formed by the Conference on College Composition and Communication
toward implementation of the Wyoming Resolution, an attempt to
better the working conditions of post-secondary teachers of
writing.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!