0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R500 - R1,000 (2)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 matches in All Departments

ANONYMITY in COLLABORATION - Anonymous Vs. Identifiable E-Peer Review in Writing Instruction (Hardcover): Ruiling Lu ANONYMITY in COLLABORATION - Anonymous Vs. Identifiable E-Peer Review in Writing Instruction (Hardcover)
Ruiling Lu
R680 Discovery Miles 6 800 Ships in 12 - 19 working days

This study compared the effects of anonymous e-peer review with identifiable e-peer review on student writing performance and perceived learning satisfaction. It also investigated whether anonymous e-peer review facilitated a greater amount of critical peer feedback. Quasiexperimental design was used to test group differences on the dependent variables. Participants were forty-eight freshmen enrolled in two English composition classes at an American urban university. The two intact classes taught by the same instructor were randomly assigned to the anonymous e-peer review group and the identifiable e-peer review group. The results of the experiment showed that students in the anonymous e-peer review group outperformed their counterparts in the identifiable e-peer review group on writing performance; students in the anonymous e-peer review group provided a greater amount of critical feedback and lower ratings on their peers' writing. No significant differences between the anonymous e-peer review group and the identifiable e-peer review group were found on student learning satisfaction.

ANONYMITY in COLLABORATION - Anonymous Vs. Identifiable E-Peer Review in Writing Instruction (Paperback): Ruiling Lu ANONYMITY in COLLABORATION - Anonymous Vs. Identifiable E-Peer Review in Writing Instruction (Paperback)
Ruiling Lu
R483 Discovery Miles 4 830 Ships in 10 - 15 working days

This study compared the effects of anonymous e-peer review with identifiable e-peer review on student writing performance and perceived learning satisfaction. It also investigated whether anonymous e-peer review facilitated a greater amount of critical peer feedback. Quasiexperimental design was used to test group differences on the dependent variables. Participants were forty-eight freshmen enrolled in two English composition classes at an American urban university. The two intact classes taught by the same instructor were randomly assigned to the anonymous e-peer review group and the identifiable e-peer review group. The results of the experiment showed that students in the anonymous e-peer review group outperformed their counterparts in the identifiable e-peer review group on writing performance; students in the anonymous e-peer review group provided a greater amount of critical feedback and lower ratings on their peers' writing. No significant differences between the anonymous e-peer review group and the identifiable e-peer review group were found on student learning satisfaction.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
Kirstenbosch - A Visitor's Guide
Colin Paterson-Jones, John Winter Paperback R160 R143 Discovery Miles 1 430
Complete Minimal Surfaces of Finite…
Kichoon Yang Hardcover R2,967 Discovery Miles 29 670
The Ancient Indus Valley - New…
Jane R McIntosh Hardcover R2,868 Discovery Miles 28 680
ADR 2017: European Agreement Concerning…
United Nations. Economic Commission for Europe Paperback R5,038 R4,215 Discovery Miles 42 150
Environmental Fate and Safety Management…
John Marshall Clark, Hideo Ohkawa Hardcover R2,710 Discovery Miles 27 100
Secrets of the Skeleton - Form in…
L.F.C. Mees Paperback R496 R463 Discovery Miles 4 630
Lowlife Highlights
Mustasch CD R526 Discovery Miles 5 260
Sun, Heat and the Energy for Life…
Baby Professor Hardcover R748 R659 Discovery Miles 6 590
Insectopedia - The Secret World of…
Erik Holm Paperback  (3)
R350 R323 Discovery Miles 3 230
Cambridge IGCSE Physics Explained…
Kaleem Akbar Paperback R1,122 Discovery Miles 11 220

 

Partners