|
|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
This study compared the effects of anonymous e-peer review with
identifiable e-peer review on student writing performance and
perceived learning satisfaction. It also investigated whether
anonymous e-peer review facilitated a greater amount of critical
peer feedback. Quasiexperimental design was used to test group
differences on the dependent variables. Participants were
forty-eight freshmen enrolled in two English composition classes at
an American urban university. The two intact classes taught by the
same instructor were randomly assigned to the anonymous e-peer
review group and the identifiable e-peer review group. The results
of the experiment showed that students in the anonymous e-peer
review group outperformed their counterparts in the identifiable
e-peer review group on writing performance; students in the
anonymous e-peer review group provided a greater amount of critical
feedback and lower ratings on their peers' writing. No significant
differences between the anonymous e-peer review group and the
identifiable e-peer review group were found on student learning
satisfaction.
This study compared the effects of anonymous e-peer review with
identifiable e-peer review on student writing performance and
perceived learning satisfaction. It also investigated whether
anonymous e-peer review facilitated a greater amount of critical
peer feedback. Quasiexperimental design was used to test group
differences on the dependent variables. Participants were
forty-eight freshmen enrolled in two English composition classes at
an American urban university. The two intact classes taught by the
same instructor were randomly assigned to the anonymous e-peer
review group and the identifiable e-peer review group. The results
of the experiment showed that students in the anonymous e-peer
review group outperformed their counterparts in the identifiable
e-peer review group on writing performance; students in the
anonymous e-peer review group provided a greater amount of critical
feedback and lower ratings on their peers' writing. No significant
differences between the anonymous e-peer review group and the
identifiable e-peer review group were found on student learning
satisfaction.
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.