This study compared the effects of anonymous e-peer review with
identifiable e-peer review on student writing performance and
perceived learning satisfaction. It also investigated whether
anonymous e-peer review facilitated a greater amount of critical
peer feedback. Quasiexperimental design was used to test group
differences on the dependent variables. Participants were
forty-eight freshmen enrolled in two English composition classes at
an American urban university. The two intact classes taught by the
same instructor were randomly assigned to the anonymous e-peer
review group and the identifiable e-peer review group. The results
of the experiment showed that students in the anonymous e-peer
review group outperformed their counterparts in the identifiable
e-peer review group on writing performance; students in the
anonymous e-peer review group provided a greater amount of critical
feedback and lower ratings on their peers' writing. No significant
differences between the anonymous e-peer review group and the
identifiable e-peer review group were found on student learning
satisfaction.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!