|
|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social issues > Animals & society
Literature on the ethics and politics of food and that on
human-animal relationships have infrequently converged.
Representing an initial step toward bridging this divide, Messy
Eating features interviews with thirteen prominent and emerging
scholars about the connections between their academic work and
their approach to consuming animals as food. The collection
explores how authors working across a range of
perspectives-postcolonial, Indigenous, black, queer, trans,
feminist, disability, poststructuralist, posthumanist, and
multispecies-weave their theoretical and political orientations
with daily, intimate, and visceral practices of food consumption,
preparation, and ingestion. Each chapter introduces a scholar for
whom the tangled, contradictory character of human-animal relations
raises difficult questions about what they eat. Representing a
departure from canonical animal rights literature, most authors
featured in the collection do not make their food politics or
identities explicit in their published work. While some
interviewees practice vegetarianism or veganism, and almost all
decry the role of industrialized animal agriculture in the
environmental crisis, the contributors tend to reject a priori
ethical codes and politics grounded in purity, surety, or
simplicity. Remarkably free of proscriptions, but attentive to the
Eurocentric tendencies of posthumanist animal studies, Messy Eating
reveals how dietary habits are unpredictable and dynamic, shaped
but not determined by life histories, educational trajectories,
disciplinary homes, activist experiences, and intimate
relationships. These accessible and engaging conversations offer
rare and often surprising insights into pressing social issues
through a focus on the mundane-and messy- interactions that
constitute the professional, the political, and the personal.
Contributors: Neel Ahuja, Billy-Ray Belcourt, Matthew Calarco,
Lauren Corman, Naisargi Dave, Maneesha Deckha, Maria Elena Garcia,
Sharon Holland, Kelly Struthers Montford, H. Peter Steeves, Kim
TallBear, Sunaura Taylor, Harlan Weaver, Kari Weil, Cary Wolfe
New and cutting-edge work in animality studies, human-animal
studies, and posthumanism Representations of animality continue to
proliferate in various kinds of literary and cultural texts. This
pioneering volume explores the critical interface between animal
and animality studies, marking out the terrain in relation to
twentieth-century literature and film. The range of texts
considered here is intentionally broad, answering questions like,
how do contemporary writers such as Amitav Ghosh, Terry Tempest
Williams, and Indra Sinha help us to think about not only animals
but also humans as animals? What kinds of creatures are being
constructed by contemporary artists such as Patricia Piccinini,
Alexis Rockman, and Michael Pestel? How do 'animalities' animate
such diverse texts as the poetry of two women publishing under the
name of 'Michael Field', or an early film by Thomas Edison
depicting the electrocution of a circus elephant named Topsy?
Connecting these issues to fields as diverse as environmental
studies and ecocriticism, queer theory, gender studies, feminist
theory, illness and disability studies, postcolonial theory, and
biopolitics, the volume also raises further questions about
disciplinarity itself, while hoping to inspire further work 'beyond
the human' in future interdisciplinary scholarship.
Through an absorbing investigation into recent, high-profile
scandals involving one of the largest kosher slaughterhouses in the
world, located unexpectedly in Postville, Iowa, Aaron S. Gross
makes a powerful case for elevating the category of the animal in
the study of religion. Major theorists have almost without
exception approached religion as a phenomenon that radically marks
humans off from other animals, but Gross rejects this paradigm,
instead matching religion more closely with the life sciences to
better theorize human nature. Gross begins with a detailed account
of the scandals at Agriprocessors and their significance for the
American and international Jewish community. He argues that without
a proper theorization of "animals and religion," we cannot fully
understand religiously and ethically motivated diets and how and
why the events at Agriprocessors took place. Subsequent chapters
recognize the significance of animals to the study of religion in
the work of Ernst Cassirer, Emile Durkheim, Mircea Eliade, Jonathan
Z. Smith, and Jacques Derrida and the value of indigenous peoples'
understanding of animals to the study of religion in our daily
lives. Gross concludes by extending the Agribusiness scandal to the
activities at slaughterhouses of all kinds, calling attention to
the religiosity informing the regulation of "secular"
slaughterhouses and its implications for our relationship with and
self-imagination through animals.
Edited by Mylan Engel Jr. and Gary Lynn Comstock, this book employs
different ethical lenses, including classical deontology,
libertarianism, commonsense morality, virtue ethics,
utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach, to explore the
philosophical basis for the strong animal rights view, which holds
that animals have moral rights equal in strength to the rights of
humans, while also addressing what are undoubtedly the most serious
challenges to the strong animal rights stance, including the
challenges posed by rights nihilism, the "kind" argument against
animal rights, the problem of predation, and the comparative value
of lives. In addition, contributors explore the practical import of
animal rights both from a social policy standpoint and from the
standpoint of personal ethical decisions concerning what to eat and
whether to hunt animals. Unlike other volumes on animal rights,
which focus primarily on the legal rights of animals, and unlike
other anthologies on animal ethics, which tend to cover a wide
variety of topics but only devote a few articles to each topic,
this volume focuses exclusively on the question of whether animals
have moral rights and the practical import of such rights. The
Moral Rights of Animals will be an indispensable resource for
scholars, teachers, and students in the fields of animal ethics,
applied ethics, ethical theory, and human-animal studies, as well
as animal rights advocates and policy makers interested in
improving the treatment of animals.
|
|