|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Philosophy of religion > General
The Abased Christ is the first monograph to be devoted exclusively
to Soren Kierkegaard's Christological masterpiece, Practice in
Christianity. Alongside an argument for a new translation of the
work's title, it offers detailed textual commentary on a series of
themes in Practice in Christianity, such as the person of Christ,
contemporaneity, imitation, and Kierkegaard's philosophy of
history. Anti-Climacus, the pseudonymous author of Practice in
Christianity, presents to his readers a uniquely challenging
understanding of who Christ is and what it means to follow him. The
Christ of Anti-Climacus is not the glorious Christ who abides with
the Father in heaven, but the abased Christ who is poor, marginal,
offensive, and persecuted. Throughout Practice in Christianity, we
are called not only to perceive the abased Christ, but to follow
after him. The Abased Christ aims to enrich historical theologians'
appreciation of Kierkegaard's Christology. However, it concludes by
grappling with questions of power, agency, and sacrifice which have
been at the forefront of contemporary theology in the 20th and 21st
centuries, thereby suggesting how we might make sense of
Kierkegaard's Christology today.
This book offers a rigorous analysis of why commitment matters and
the challenges it presents to a range of believers. Peter Forrest
treats commitment as a response to lost innocence. He considers the
intellectual consequences of this by demonstrating why, for
example, we should not believe in angels. He then explores why
humans are attached to reason and to humanism, recognising the
different commitments made by theist and non-theist humanists.
Finally, he analyses religious faith, specifically fideism,
defining it by way of contrast to Descartes, Pascal and William
James, as well as contemporary philosophers including John
Schellenberg and Lara Buchak. Of particular interest to scholars
working on the philosophy of religion, the book makes the case both
for and against committing to God, recognising that God's divine
character sets up an emotional rather than an intellectual barrier
to commitment to worship.
Charting a genealogy of the modern idea of the self, Felix O
Murchadha explores the accounts of self-identity expounded by key
Early Modern philosophers, Montaigne, Descartes, Pascal, Spinoza,
Hume and Kant. The question of the self as we would discuss it
today only came to the forefront of philosophical concern with
Modernity, beginning with an appeal to the inherited models of the
self found in Stoicism, Scepticism, Augustinianism and Pelagianism,
before continuing to develop as a subject of philosophical debate.
Exploring this trajectory, The Formation of the Modern Self pursues
a number of themes central to the Early Modern development of
selfhood, including, amongst others, grace and passion. It examines
on the one hand the deep-rooted dependence on the divine and the
longing for happiness and salvation and, on the other hand, the
distancing from the Stoic ideal of apatheia, as philosophers from
Descartes to Spinoza recognised the passions as essential to human
agency. Fundamental to the new question of the self was the
relation of faith and reason. Uncovering commonalities and
differences amongst Early Modern philosophers, O Murchadha traces
how the voluntarism of Modernity led to the sceptical approach to
the self in Montaigne and Hume and how this sceptical strand, in
turn, culminated in Kant's rational faith. More than a history of
the self in philosophy, The Formation of the Modern Self inspires a
fresh look at self-identity, uncovering not only how our modern
idea of selfhood developed but just how embedded the concept of
self is in external considerations: from ethics, to reason, to
religion.
Hegel's philosophy of religion contains an implicit political
theology. When viewed in connection with his wider work on
subjectivity, history and politics, this political theology is a
resource for apocalyptic thinking. In a world of climate change,
inequality, oppressive gender roles and racism, Hegel can be used
to theorise the hope found in the end of that world. Histories of
apocalyptic thinking draw a line connecting the medieval prophet
Joachim of Fiore and Marx. This line passes through Hegel, who
transforms the relationship between philosophy and theology by
philosophically employing theological concepts to critique the
world. Jacob Taubes provides an example of this Hegelian political
theology, weaving Christianity, Judaism and philosophy to develop
an apocalypticism that is not invested in the world. Taubes awaits
the end of the world knowing that apocalyptic destruction is also a
form of creation. Catherine Malabou discusses this relationship
between destruction and creation in terms of plasticity. Using
plasticity to reformulate apocalypticism allows for a form of
apocalyptic thinking that is immanent and materialist. Together
Hegel, Taubes and Malabou provide the resources for thinking about
why the world should end. The resulting apocalyptic pessimism is
not passive, but requires an active refusal of the world.
An Introduction to Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion
examines Hegel's religious thinking by seeing it against the
backdrop of the main religious trends in his own day, specifically
the Enlightenment and Romanticism. A basic introduction to Hegel's
lectures, it provides an account of the criticism of religion by
key Enlightenment thinkers such as Voltaire, Lessing, Hume, and
Kant. This is followed by an analysis of how the Romantic thinkers,
such as Rousseau, Jacobi and Schleiermacher, responded to these
challenges. For Hegel, the views of these thinkers from both the
Enlightenment and Romanticism tended to empty religion of its
content. The goal that he sets for his own philosophy of religion
is to restore this lost content. The book provides a detailed
account of Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion and
argues that the basic ideas of the Enlightenment and Romanticism
are still present today, and remain an important issue for both
academics and non-academics, regardless of their religious
orientation.
|
|