|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > General > History of religion
Throughout China's rapidly growing cities, a new wave of
unregistered house churches is growing. They are developing rich
theological perspectives that are both uniquely Chinese and rooted
in the historical doctrines of the faith. To understand how they
have endured despite government pressure and cultural
marginalization, we must understand both their history and their
theology. In this volume, key writings from the house church have
been compiled, translated, and made accessible to English speakers.
Featured here is a manifesto by well-known pastor Wang Yi and his
church, Early Rain Covenant Church in Chengdu, to clarify their
theological stance on the house church and its relationship to the
Chinese government. There are also works by prominent voices such
as Jin Tianming, Jin Mingri, and Sun Yi. The editors have provided
introductions, notes, and a glossary to give context to each
selection. These writings are an important body of theology
historically and spiritually. Though defined by a specific set of
circumstances, they have universal applications in a world where
the relationship between church and state is more complicated than
ever. This unique resource will be valuable to practical and
political theologians as well as readers interested in
international relations, political philosophy, history, and
intercultural studies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e15/24e1571a3a01bff70f72becbd77cfb1b22c6e357" alt="Cyprian (Hardcover): John Alfred Faulkner" |
Cyprian
(Hardcover)
John Alfred Faulkner
|
R1,148
R939
Discovery Miles 9 390
Save R209 (18%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
This account of the life of St. Ignatius, dictated by himself, is
considered the most valuable record of the great Founder of the
Society of Jesus. It gives an insight into the spiritual life of
St. Ignatius detailing his conversion, his trials, the obstacles in
his way, the heroism with which he accomplished his great mission.
Few works in ascetical literature impart such a knowledge of the
soul.
This book investigates the relationship between justification by
faith and final judgment according to works as found in Paul's
second epistle to the Corinthians within a Protestant theological
framework. Benjamin M. Dally first demonstrates the diversity and
breadth of mainstream Protestant soteriology and eschatology
beginning at the time of the Reformation by examining the
confessional standards of its four primary ecclesial/theological
streams: Lutheran, Reformed, Anabaptist, and Anglican. The
soteriological structure of each is assessed (i.e., how each
construes the relationship between justification and final
judgment), with particular attention given to how each speaks of
the place of good works at the final judgment. This initial
examination outlines the theological boundaries within which the
exegesis of Second Corinthians can legitimately proceed, and
illuminates language and conceptual matrices that will be drawn
upon throughout the remainder of thebook. Then, drawing upon the
narrative logic of Paul's Early Jewish thought-world, Dally
examines the text of Second Corinthians to discern its own
soteriological framework, paying particular attention to both the
meaning and rhetorical function of the "judgment according to
works" motif as it is utilized throughout the letter. The book
concludes by offering a Protestant synthesis of the relationship
between justification and final judgment according to works in
Second Corinthians, giving an explanation of the role of works at
the final judgment that arguably alleviates a number of tensions
often perceived in other readings devoted to this key aspect of
Pauline exegesis and theology. Dally ultimately argues a three-fold
thesis: (1) For the believer one's earthly conduct, taken as a
whole, is best spoken of in the language of inferior/secondary
"cause" and/or "basis" as far as its import at the last judgment.
(2) One's earthly conduct, again taken as a whole, is
soteriologically necessary (not solely, but secondarily
nonetheless) and not simply of importance for the bestowal of
non-soteriological, eschatological rewards. (3) There are crucial
resources from within mainstream Protestantism to authorize such
ways of speaking and to simultaneously affirm these contentions in
conjunction with a robust, strictly forensic/imputational,
"traditional" Protestant understanding of the doctrine of
justification by faith alone.
|
|