|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Philosophy of religion
How would Socrates and Plato react to a modern world where
secularism and religious fundamentalism are growing while the gap
between the human mind and animal mind is narrowing? Using some
creative license mixed with real history, science, and philosophy,
Seeking Perfection addresses that question. Matt J. Rossano uses a
narrative/dialogue format to superimpose on modern times ancient
Greece's two most eminent philosophers, along with its government
and culture. The story begins with Plato's daring escape from
Sicily, where he tutored Dionysius II in philosophy. On board his
homebound ship, Plato recounts his experiences in Sicily. In this
narrative, the intellectual difference between practical rewards
and the pursuit of ideals provides the basis for a series of
dialogue on science, secularism, religion, and the uniqueness of
the human mind. Upon the ship's arrival home, Plato's mentor,
Socrates, is arrested and his trial provides the venue for the
book's final dialogue. The final dialogue serves as a counterweight
to the earlier ones. Rossano begins and ends with a philosopher
imprisoned by his views, indicative of one of its main messages:
the true philosopher uses a well-disciplined mind and the best
knowledge of the day to get as close to the truth as possible. In
doing so, he invariably gets into trouble. This imaginatively
constructed tale will absorb those interested in what the
philosophical masters might say about today's world.
Applies Dogen Kigen's religious philosophy and the philosophy of
Nishida Kitaro to the philosophical problem of personal identity,
probing the applicability of the concept of non-self to the
philosophical problems of selfhood, otherness, and temporality
which culminate in the conundrum of personal identity.
Sudduth provides a critical exploration of classical empirical
arguments for survival arguments that purport to show that data
collected from ostensibly paranormal phenomena constitute good
evidence for the survival of the self after death. Utilizing the
conceptual tools of formal epistemology, he argues that classical
arguments are unsuccessful.
"The Emerging Religion of Science" is a broad and erudite
examination of the individual's place in the modern world. What can
we believe today that will not betray us tomorrow? the author asks.
Religion is losing influence. But the scientist, who explores the
laws of nature, may be the modern guide to meaning. The
mathematical equations of science have become unifying elements of
the world as we know it. The author explores ways to face today's
problems within the context of good and evil, freedom and
restraint, probability and certainty, the real and the illusory,
and the concept of self. He offers the view that, thought the paths
we take may be different, we are all searching for the same thing:
a thread on which the beads of experience and education can be
strung.
This book is an exploration of philosophical questions about
infinity. Graham Oppy examines how the infinite lurks everywhere,
both in science and in our ordinary thoughts about the world. He
also analyses the many puzzles and paradoxes that follow in the
train of the infinite. Even simple notions, such as counting,
adding and maximising present serious difficulties. Other topics
examined include the nature of space and time, infinities in
physical science, infinities in theories of probability and
decision, the nature of part/whole relations, mathematical theories
of the infinite, and infinite regression and principles of
sufficient reason.
This book challenges the modern myth that tolerance grows as
societies become less religious. The myth inseparably links the
progress of toleration to the secularization of modern society.
This volume scrutinizes this grand narrative theoretically and
empirically, and proposes alternative accounts of the varied
relationships between diverse interpretations of religion and
secularity and multiple secularizations, desecularizations, and
forms of toleration. The authors show how both secular and
religious orthodoxies inform toleration and persecution, and how
secularizations and desecularizations engender repressive or
pluralistic regimes. Ultimately, the book offers an agency-focused
perspective which links the variation in toleration and persecution
to the actors of secularization and desecularization and their
cultural programs.
Soren Kierkegaard's Christian existentialism provides a unique
framework for thinking about the problem of religious pluralism.
This problem arises from the fact that there are lots of different
religions in the world and each of them teaches different things.
Accordingly, it is difficult to know which one, if any, ought to be
believed in as actually being true. Fehir defends his view of
Kierkegaard's understanding of faith and uses it to deal with
common philosophical problems related to pluralism. In the course
of advancing this argument, Kierkegaardian Reflections of the
Problem of Pluralism also engages in interreligious dialogue by
comparing Kierkegaard's views with representatives from Buddhism,
Judaism, and Taoism.
Is belief in God epistemically justified? That's the question at
the heart of this volume in the "Great Debates in Philosophy"
series, with Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley each addressing
this fundamental question with distinctive arguments from opposing
perspectives.The first half of the book contains each philosopher's
explanation of his particular view; the second half allows them to
directly respond to each other's arguments, in a lively and
engaging conversationOffers the reader a one of a kind, interactive
discussionForms part of the acclaimed "Great Debates in Philosophy"
series
The book God, Truth, and other Enigmas is a collection of eighteen
essays that fall under four headings: (God's)
Existence/Non-Existence, Omniscience, Truth, and Metaphysical
Enigmas. The essays vary widely in topic and tone. They provide the
reader with an overview of contemporary philosophical approaches to
the subjects that are indicated in the title of the book.
This book defends antitheodicism, arguing that theodicies, seeking
to excuse God for evil and suffering in the world, fail to
ethically acknowledge the victims of suffering. The authors argue
for this view using literary and philosophical resources,
commencing with Immanuel Kant's 1791 "Theodicy Essay" and its
reading of the Book of Job. Three important twentieth century
antitheodicist positions are explored, including "Jewish"
post-Holocaust ethical antitheodicism, Wittgensteinian
antitheodicism exemplified by D.Z. Phillips and pragmatist
antitheodicism defended by William James. The authors argue that
these approaches to evil and suffering are fundamentally Kantian.
Literary works such as Franz Kafka's The Trial, Samuel Beckett's
Waiting for Godot, and George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, are
examined in order to crucially advance the philosophical case for
antitheodicism.
From 'The Holy Land Experience' theme park to the aggressive
convictions of the fundamentalist, religion is once more haunting
the imagination of the West. But how does what we think of as
religion today compare with the 'true religion' of days gone by?
Through reference to plays, poetry, painting, novels and films,
this manifesto traces the genealogy of 'true religion' in the
Western world, charting changes in our understanding of the term
from Shakespeare to Salman Rushdie, pointing out how closely linked
those changes are to secularism, liberalism and the development of
capitalism. On the basis of his cultural analysis, the author makes
several paradoxical observations: While the idea of true religion
has fashioned our understanding of democracy and liberal humanism,
it is also closely bound to imperialism. What we are currently
witnessing in Western culture is the disintegration of the concept
of 'religion' and yet the reintroduction of religion into the
market is a defining characteristic of postmodernity. With the
commodification of religion the only viable future for faith
traditions is to turn to theology, but that will generate more
culture wars. To resolve culture wars each tradition must both
strongly define itself and resist the pressure to turn their own
faith into a fetish. The book is guaranteed to excite students and
scholars of literature, theology and religion, as well as the
general reader.
|
|