Newspapers and TV often report controversial risk warnings over
technological innovations, scientific developments, or
environmental hazards that have at their core a dispute between
experts who contradict one another not only on preferred policy but
also on the scientific facts that underlie decisions about public
policy. Recent examples are the disputes about climate change,
fracking, vaccination and autism, and genetically modified
organisms (GMOs). Adversaries mobilize constituents with similar
interests or ideologies, form opposing coalitions, and compete for
media exposure. They articulate arguments and counterarguments.
"Facts" become malleable, differently appraised by each side.
Uncongenial evidence is ignored or discredited. For many
adversaries, winning the policy argument is primary; evaluating the
true degree of hazard is secondary. How can we determine which
side's "facts" are right and which wrong? Do news media enlighten
the public or worsen polarization? Can policymakers deal with
controversial science and technology more cogently than they do
now?
General
Imprint: |
Routledge
|
Country of origin: |
United Kingdom |
Release date: |
August 2017 |
First published: |
2018 |
Authors: |
Allan Mazur
|
Dimensions: |
229 x 152mm (L x W) |
Format: |
Hardcover
|
Pages: |
202 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-138-06904-6 |
Categories: |
Books >
Social sciences >
Politics & government >
General
|
LSN: |
1-138-06904-3 |
Barcode: |
9781138069046 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!