Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Financial, taxation, commercial, industrial law > Energy & natural resources law
|
Buy Now
Gasoline Prices - Policies, Practices & Prospects (Hardcover, Illustrated Ed)
Loot Price: R1,438
Discovery Miles 14 380
You Save: R853
(37%)
|
|
Gasoline Prices - Policies, Practices & Prospects (Hardcover, Illustrated Ed)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
As major energy legislation moved to conference, the high price of
gasoline remained a major consideration. The legislative proposals
of past Congresses have contained numerous provisions that would
affect gasoline supply and demand. This is true also of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, H.R. 6, both the version passed by the House
April 21, and the Senate bill, passed June 28. A large number of
factors combined to put pressure on gasoline prices, including
increased world demand for crude oil and US refinery capacity
inadequate to supply gasoline to a recovering national economy. The
war and continued violence in Iraq added uncertainty and a threat
of supply disruption that added pressure particularly to the
commodity futures markets. Numerous provisions in legislative
proposals in the 108th Congress addressed perceived problems in the
oil and gasoline markets. A comprehensive energy policy bill was
reported out of conference and approved by the House, but several
issues kept the bill from passing the Senate. Among the most
controversial were provisions regarding the use of ethanol and the
additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) in motor fuel,
proposals to open up part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR) to oil and gas development, measures concerning corporate
average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, and proposals to aid
construction of new refineries and to harmonise state "boutique
fuels" standards. In the 109th Congress, the House passed a
comprehensive bill, H.R. 6, with many of the same provisions of the
bill considered in the previous Congress. As before, MTBE and ANWR,
included in the House-passed bill, remain controversial. The House
bill added another controversial provision, giving the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) overriding authority over state
entities in licensing terminals to receive and process liquefied
natural gas. In the Senate version of H.R. 6, the MTBE safe harbour
provision has been omitted. The Senate bill contains a provision,
not in the House-passed version, directing the President to take
measures to reduce total demand for petroleum by one million
barrels per day (mbd) by 2015. An amendment by Senator Cantwell,
which would have set the goal of reducing petroleum imports by 40%
by 2025, was defeated on the floor by a vote of 47-53. The gasoline
price surge heightened discussion of energy policy, but the urgency
of previous energy crises has been lacking. In part this may be due
to the fact that there has been no physical shortage of gasoline,
and no lines at the pump. In addition, the expectation of former
crises, that prices were destined to grow ever higher, has not been
prevalent. However, the persistence of high gasoline and oil prices
into a second summer has raised alarms over the economic
consequences of the situation.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|