That natural resources can be a curse as well as a blessing is
almost a truism in political analysis. In many late-developing
countries, the "resource curse" theory predicts, the exploitation
of valuable resources will not result in stable, prosperous states
but rather in their opposite. Petroleum deposits, for example, may
generate so much income that rulers will have little need to
establish efficient, tax-extracting bureaucracies, leading to
shallow, poorly functioning administrations that remain at the
mercy of the world market for oil. Alternatively, resources may be
geographically concentrated, thereby intensifying regional, ethnic,
or other divisive tensions.
In Hard Times in the Land of Plenty, Benjamin Smith deciphers
the paradox of the resource curse and questions its inevitability
through an innovative comparison of the experiences of Iran and
Indonesia. These two populous, oil-rich countries saw profoundly
different changes in their fortunes in the period 1960 1980.
Focusing on the roles of state actors and organized opposition in
using oil revenues, Smith finds that the effects of oil wealth on
politics and on regime durability vary according to the
circumstances under which oil exports became a major part of a
country's economy. The presence of natural resources is, he argues,
a political opportunity rather than simply a structural
variable.
Drawing on extensive primary research in Iran and Indonesia and
quantitative research on nineteen other oil-rich developing
countries, Smith challenges us to reconsider resource wealth in
late-developing countries, not as a simple curse or blessing, but
instead as a tremendously flexible source of both political
resources and potential complications."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!