This study examines perspectives of the two influential U.S. think
tanks, the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign
Relations, on Turkish foreign policy under the leadership of the
Justice and Development Party (JDP) from 2002 to 2010. It attempts
to analyze the perceptions of the noted institutions about the
JDP's foreign policy by referencing their reports, articles,
interviews and seminars. The study had four aims. First, it aims to
analyze the JDP's foreign policy in the eyes of the two think
tanks. Second, it shows the objective of the two institutions for
shaping the framework of the discussions on the United
States-Turkey relations and Turkish foreign policy by emphasizing
the epistemic community. Third, this thesis intends to clarify
divergences and convergences in the perceptions of the two
institutions. Fourth, it indicates the continuity, change and
rupture in the JDP's foreign policy choices from the viewpoint of
the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Consequently, the thesis states that "the given framework" in the
relations between the United States and Turkey has been largely
determined by the U.S.' activities.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!