This book deals with one of the most puzzling concepts in economic
science, that of economic equilibrium. In modern economics,
equilibrium is considered a key assumption, but its role is
contested by economists both from within the mainstream and from
rival schools of thought. What explains the contradictory
assessments of the equilibrium concept in economics? Do economists
belonging to different traditions disagree about the definition of
equilibrium or do they adopt different rules for assessing
scientific status? In this unique and exhaustive study, Bert Tieben
answers these questions by investigating the history of equilibrium
economics from 1700 to the present day. He concludes that ideology
strongly colored the development of this branch of theory, helping
to explain the vehemence of the debates surrounding the concept. He
also argues that scientific progress in economics may indeed be
fostered by such opposition and contention, and calls for cross
fertilization and stronger cooperation between the different
schools of thought. This resourceful book will appeal to post
graduate students and scholars in the history of economic thought
and economic methodology. Both neoclassical and heterodox
economists, most notably Austrian, post Keynesian and institutional
economists, will also find much to interest them.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!