Is democracy hazardous to the health of the environment?
Addressing this and related questions, Bob Pepperman Taylor
analyzes contemporary environmental political thought in America.
He begins with the premise that environmental thinking is
necessarily political thinking because environmental problems, both
in their cause and effect, are collective problems. They are also
problems that signal limits to what the environment can tolerate.
Those limits directly challege orthodox democratic theory, which
encourages expanding individual and political freedoms and is
predicated on growth and abundance in our society. Balancing the
competing needs of the natural world and the polity, Taylor
asserts, must become the heart of the environmental debate.
Contemporary environmental thinking derives, according to
Taylor, from two well-established traditions in American political
thought. The pastoral tradition, which he traces from Thoreau
through John Muir to today's deep ecology, biocentrism, and Green
movement, appeals to moral lessons that nature can teach us. The
progressive tradition--which he traces from Gifford Pinchot to the
apostate neo-malthusians (who reject the commitment to democratic
equality) and liberal theorists like Roderick Nash, Christopher
Stone, and Mark Sagoff--focuses on the role that nature plays in
supporting a liberal democratic society. This analysis sidesteps
the usual anthropocentric-biocentric formulation of the debate,
which tends to center on the most appropriate conception of nature
abstractly considered, and reorients the discussion to a
consideration of the relationship between our political and
environmental values. If we are to stem the thoughtless pillaging
of the environment, Taylor contends, that's where the changes must
occur.
Any satisfactory resolution of the tension between the garden
and the machine must draw upon the best of both the pastoral and
progressive traditions, Taylor concludes. The best of pastoralism
teaches us that any reform must challenge the human arrogance and
crude materialism that permeates much of liberal society.
In addition to Nash, Stone, and Sagoff, Taylor discusses other
contemporary thinkers such as Garrett Hardin, Paul Ehrlich, Robert
Heilbroner, William Ophuls, Julian Simon, Robert Paehlke, J. Donald
Moon, Kirkpatrick Sale, J. Baird Callicott, Holmes Rolston, Paul
Taylor, Barry Commoner, and Murray Bookchin.
"The contemporary environmental movement needs to step back from
the hurly-burly of its political struggles to do some deep thinking
about ends and means. This book is a useful tool for doing that. It
is a clearly written, well organized, and thoughtful guide to many
of the more important thinkers who have appeared in recent decades
on environmental issues and ethics. Best of all, the author points
us to what may be the central question of our times: how can we
achieve a society that is at once true to our democratic traditions
and yet recognizes in nature an intrinsic set of values?"--Don
Worster, author of "Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological
Ideas."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!