Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence
|
Buy Now
The Effects of Warning on Strategic Stability (Paperback, Illustrated Ed)
Loot Price: R407
Discovery Miles 4 070
|
|
The Effects of Warning on Strategic Stability (Paperback, Illustrated Ed)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R407
Discovery Miles 4 070
Expected to ship within 12 - 19 working days
|
Among its many important effects, the political revolution in
central Europe has provided a sharp reminder that international
security is as much a state of mind as it is a physical condition.
The threat of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe, long
hypothesized by Western defense ministries on the basis of a
perceived imbalance in inherent conventional force capability, is
now acknowledged to be a practical impossibility because shifts in
political alignment have been credited. In the wake of that
judgement, the force deployments themselves are virtually certain
to be reduced, equalized, and disengaged, thereby removing
firepower advantage as a threat to international stability.
Moreover, though the intrinsic connection is remote, a similar
judgement seems to be affecting global strategic deployments. As
strategic forces are projected to be reduced to common ceilings by
mutual agreement, the fear of preemptive attacks on theoretically
vulnerable land-based installations appears to be receding more
rapidly than the inherent capability that originally inspired it.
This relief from the narrowly focused, obsessive fears that have
dominated U.S. security policy for several decades is certainly a
constructive development, but unfortunately it is not
comprehensively valid. For strategic forces in particular, some
subtle interaction between human judgement and physical capability
remain potentially dangerous, presenting a security problem that
will not be resolved simply by completing the projected agenda of
national weapons development and international arms control
agreements. The problem arises from conceivable combinations of
events that are undoubtedly improbable but
unprecedentedlycatastrophic should any of them ever occur. The
standards of safety that have evolved for improbable disasters of
much smaller magnitudenuclear reactor meltdown, for examplehave
been applied to only peacetime operations and have not been
extended to the circumstances of advanced crisis or to the actual
implications of combat operations. To appreciate the implications
of this limitation and the dangers that emerge from it requires a
substantial revision of standard perspectives on strategic
security.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.